United States of America v. Bamgbala (Ajelero)
| Hakeem Bamgbala and Michael Campbell |
| United States of America |
| Afolabi Ajelero |
| 22-1825 |
| August 19, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Katie Bagley for United States of America, in case 22-1825, [ # 7 ], ADDED.[3372033] [22-1825] [Entered: 08/26/2022 09:08 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee USA United States of America, FILED. Service date 08/25/2022 by CM/ECF. [3371911] [22-1825] [Entered: 08/25/2022 04:47 PM] |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY, Hannah Cook, [ # 5 ], in place of attorney David C. James, SUBSTITUTED.[3371817] [22-1825] [Entered: 08/25/2022 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee USA United States of America, FILED. Service date 08/25/2022 by CM/ECF. [3371548] [22-1825] [Entered: 08/25/2022 11:56 AM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3368670] [22-1825] [Entered: 08/22/2022 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Afolabi Ajelero, district court receipt # 100000956, FILED.[3368669] [22-1825] [Entered: 08/22/2022 09:51 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 08/09/2022, RECEIVED.[3368667] [22-1825] [Entered: 08/22/2022 09:51 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Afolabi Ajelero, FILED. [3368660] [22-1825] [Entered: 08/22/2022 09:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
