Cook v. Martin
| Andrew Cook |
| Martin, Warden and State of Connecticut |
| 22-1838 |
| August 23, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| PRISONER PET-Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 33 MOTION ORDER, denying motion to reinstate as unnecessary directing Appellant pay filing fee or move for IFP in docket number 22-1873 within 21 days [ # 27 ], FILED. [3392383][33] [22-1838, 22-1873] [Entered: 10/03/2022 11:50 AM] |
| Filing 31 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Andrew Cook, informing Court of proposed due date 12/08/2022, RECEIVED. Service date 09/20/2022 by US mail.[3391623] [22-1838] [Entered: 09/30/2022 01:24 PM] |
| Filing 30 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Andrew Cook, informing Court of proposed due date 12/08/2022, RECEIVED. Service date 09/20/2022 by US mail.[3391617] [22-1873] [Entered: 09/30/2022 01:22 PM] |
| Filing 29 PAPERS, Form D-P and Acknolwdgment and Notice of Apppearance, on behalf of Appellant Andrew Cook, RECEIVED.[3391602] [22-1873] [Entered: 09/30/2022 01:16 PM] |
| Filing 27 MOTION, to reinstate appeal, on behalf of Appellant Andrew Cook in 22-1873, FILED. Service date 09/22/2022 by US mail.[3391571] [22-1873, 22-1838] [Entered: 09/30/2022 01:08 PM] |
| Filing 26 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Andrew Cook, FILED. Service date 09/09/2022 by US mail.[3388519] [22-1873] [Entered: 09/26/2022 12:39 PM] |
| Filing 25 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Andrew Cook, FILED. Service date 09/09/2022 by US mail.[3388516] [22-1873] [Entered: 09/26/2022 12:38 PM] |
| Filing 19 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Andrew Cook, FILED. Service date 09/12/2022 by US mail.[3384466] [22-1838] [Entered: 09/19/2022 12:41 PM] |
| Filing 16 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Andrew Cook, FILED. Service date 09/01/2022 by US mail.[3378936] [22-1838] [Entered: 09/08/2022 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 15 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Andrew Cook, FILED. Service date 09/01/2022 by US mail.[3378932] [22-1838] [Entered: 09/08/2022 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 12 LETTER, dated 09/01/2022, on behalf of Appellant Andrew Cook in 22-1838, informing the Court that there is a pending Motion for IFP in the District Court, RECEIVED. Service date 09/01/2022 by US mail.[3378089] [22-1838, 22-1873] [Entered: 09/07/2022 04:34 PM] |
| Filing 11 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3372987] [22-1873] [Entered: 08/29/2022 10:16 AM] |
| Filing 9 NOTE: See lead case, 22-1838, containing complete set of docket entries.[3372983] [22-1873] [Entered: 08/29/2022 10:15 AM] |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3372980] [22-1873] [Entered: 08/29/2022 10:11 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Andrew Cook in 22-1873, FILED. [3372974] [22-1873, 22-1838] [Entered: 08/29/2022 10:07 AM] |
| Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3370436] [22-1838] [Entered: 08/24/2022 08:45 AM] |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3370434] [22-1838] [Entered: 08/24/2022 08:43 AM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 07/21/2022, RECEIVED.[3370430] [22-1838] [Entered: 08/24/2022 08:41 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT RULING AND ORDER, dated 07/19/2022, RECEIVED.[3370429] [22-1838] [Entered: 08/24/2022 08:40 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Andrew Cook, FILED. [3370424] [22-1838] [Entered: 08/24/2022 08:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
