Jones v. The City of New York
| Erin Jones |
| The City of New York |
| 22-1867 |
| August 26, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Americans w/Disibilities Act-E |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Erin Jones Brief due date as 12/09/2022. Joint Appendix due date as 12/09/2022, copy to prose, FILED.[3387923] [22-1867] [Entered: 09/23/2022 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 20 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Erin Jones, informing Court of proposed due date 12/09/2022, RECEIVED. Service date 09/23/2022 by US mail.[3387828] [22-1867] [Entered: 09/23/2022 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 18 NEW CASE MANAGER, Brenda Mojica, copy to pro se, ASSIGNED.[3387035] [22-1867] [Entered: 09/22/2022 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 15 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee The City of New York, FILED. Service date 09/13/2022 by US mail.[3381517] [22-1867] [Entered: 09/13/2022 07:52 PM] |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY, Eva L. Jerome, [ # 13 ], in place of attorney Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix, SUBSTITUTED.[3381262] [22-1867] [Entered: 09/13/2022 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee The City of New York, FILED. Service date 09/12/2022 by US mail. [3381250] [22-1867] [Entered: 09/13/2022 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE, to Appellee The City of New York , for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[3381231] [22-1867] [Entered: 09/13/2022 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 11 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Erin Jones, FILED. Service date 09/09/2022 by US mail.[3380623] [22-1867] [Entered: 09/12/2022 04:37 PM] |
| Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Erin Jones, FILED. Service date 09/09/2022 by US mail.[3380619] [22-1867] [Entered: 09/12/2022 04:36 PM] |
| Filing 7 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3372915] [22-1867] [Entered: 08/29/2022 09:23 AM] |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3372752] [22-1867] [Entered: 08/26/2022 06:10 PM] |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Erin Jones, district court receipt # 4938, FILED.[3372751] [22-1867] [Entered: 08/26/2022 06:09 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 07/27/2022, RECEIVED.[3372750] [22-1867] [Entered: 08/26/2022 06:08 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 01/08/2020, RECEIVED.[3372749] [22-1867] [Entered: 08/26/2022 06:06 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Erin Jones, FILED. [3372747] [22-1867] [Entered: 08/26/2022 06:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jones v. The City of New York | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Erin Jones | |
| Represented By: | Erin Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: The City of New York | |
| Represented By: | Sylvia Hinds-Radix Esq. |
| Represented By: | Eva Jerome Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
