Johnson v. Doubletree by Hilton Syracuse
Robert W. Johnson |
Georgeann Stevenson, Robert J. Rodriguez, Kathy Hochul, M. Burns, Jefferson County DSS, Tracy Eveleigh, Pro Se Government Employee, The Workplace, Deborah Labadini, Teresa Gaffney, Commissioner, Jefferson County Department of Social Services, Double Tree by Hilton Syracuse, Corporation, Marissa Prasad, Pro Se Corporation Employee, Nagib Lakhani, Thomas Olsen, Kelsey Cleary, Kevin Connolly and Revmax Hospitality Consulting Services, Pro Se Corporation |
22-1891 |
August 30, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3377295] [22-1891] [Entered: 09/06/2022 07:41 PM] |
Filing 8 NOTICE, to Respondent Double Tree by Hilton Syracuse, Jefferson County Department of Social Services, Revmax Hospitality Consulting Services and The Workplace, regarding a corporation proceeding Pro Se, and requesting a response 30 days from the date of this letter, SENT.[3374366] [22-1891] [Entered: 08/30/2022 11:12 PM] |
Filing 7 ORDER, dated 08/30/2022, dismissing appeal by 09/20/2022, unless Petitioner Robert W. Johnson, submits a motion for leave to file, copy to pro se petitioner, FILED.[3374365] [22-1891] [Entered: 08/30/2022 11:05 PM] |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3374361] [22-1891] [Entered: 08/30/2022 10:58 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 08/02/2022, RECEIVED.[3374360] [22-1891] [Entered: 08/30/2022 10:57 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, and district court docket, on behalf of Petitioner Robert W. Johnson, RECEIVED.[3374359] [22-1891] [Entered: 08/30/2022 10:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.