Carson v. Commissioner of Social Securit
| Jeffrey Michael Carson |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 22-191 |
| January 31, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| SOC SEC-SSID Title XVI |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER, [ # 13 ] appeal dismissed for Appellant Jeffrey Michael Carson failure to file form D-P, EFFECTIVE. [3283658] [22-191] [Entered: 03/23/2022 04:44 PM]
|
| Filing 17 NEW CASE MANAGER, Margaret Lain, ASSIGNED.[3283653] [22-191] [Entered: 03/23/2022 04:41 PM] |
|
Filing 14
ORDER, dated 02/22/2022, dismissing appeal by 03/15/2022, unless Appellant Jeffrey Michael Carson, submits form Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3264729] [22-191] [Entered: 02/22/2022 09:44 AM]
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER, dated 02/22/2022, dismissing appeal by 03/15/2022, unless Appellant Jeffrey Michael Carson, submits form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3264725] [22-191] [Entered: 02/22/2022 09:39 AM]
|
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY, Molly E. Carter for Commissioner of Social Security, in case 22-191, [ # 11 ], ADDED.[3255413] [22-191] [Entered: 02/03/2022 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Commissioner of Social Security, FILED. Service date 02/03/2022 by CM/ECF. [3255126] [22-191] [Entered: 02/03/2022 10:47 AM] |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Karen Folster Lesperance, [ # 9 ], in place of attorney Rajit Singh Dosanjh, SUBSTITUTED.[3254365] [22-191] [Entered: 02/02/2022 11:02 AM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Commissioner of Social Security, FILED. Service date 02/02/2022 by US mail. [3254190] [22-191] [Entered: 02/02/2022 09:23 AM] |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Karen Folster Lesperance, [ # 9 ], in place of attorney Rajit Singh Dosanjh, SUBSTITUTED.[3254365] [22-191] [Entered: 02/02/2022 11:02 AM] |
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3253473] [22-191] [Entered: 02/01/2022 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3253470] [22-191] [Entered: 02/01/2022 10:07 AM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Jeffrey Michael Carson, district court receipt # ANYNDC-5787938, FILED.[3253468] [22-191] [Entered: 02/01/2022 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 12/02/2021, RECEIVED.[3253464] [22-191] [Entered: 02/01/2022 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Jeffrey Michael Carson, FILED. [3253449] [22-191] [Entered: 02/01/2022 10:03 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Carson v. Commissioner of Social Securit | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Jeffrey Michael Carson | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Michael Carson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Karen Folster Lesperance Esq. |
| Represented By: | Molly E. Carter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
