Johnson v. Hampton Inn & Suites Syracuse /Carrier Circle
Robert W. Johnson |
Marcus Rabit, Pro Se Corporation Employee, Hampton Inn & Suites Syracuse/Carrier Circle, Pro se Corporation, Jefferson County Dept. of Social Services, Teresa Gaffney, The Workplace, Pro se Gov't Employee, Deborah Labidini, Pro se Gov't Employee, M. Burns, of Jefferson County DSS, Pro se Gov't Employee, Tracy Eveleigh, Pro se Gov't Employee, Kathy Hochul, Pro se Gov't Employee, Robert J. Rodriguez, Pro se Gov't Employee and Georgeann Stevenson, Pro se Gov't Employee |
22-1924 |
August 31, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3377310] [22-1924] [Entered: 09/06/2022 09:02 PM] |
Filing 6 NOTICE, to Respondent Hampton Inn & Suites Syracuse/Carrier Circle, Jefferson County Dept. of Social Services and The Workplace, regarding a corporation proceeding Pro Se, and requesting a response 30 days from the date of this letter, SENT.[3375920] [22-1924] [Entered: 09/02/2022 11:50 AM] |
Filing 5 ORDER, dated 09/02/2022, dismissing appeal by 09/23/2022, unless Petitioner Robert W. Johnson, submits motion for leave to file, copy to pro se petitioner, FILED.[3375910] [22-1924] [Entered: 09/02/2022 11:45 AM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 08/02/2022, RECEIVED.[3375904] [22-1924] [Entered: 09/02/2022 11:40 AM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, and district court docket, on behalf of Petitioner Robert W. Johnson, RECEIVED.[3375902] [22-1924] [Entered: 09/02/2022 11:38 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.