Suri v. Excel at Woodbury for Rehabilitation and Nursing
| Veena Suri, as Proposed Executrix of the Estate of, Gireesh K. Suri, Deceased |
| Excel at Woodbury for Rehabilitation and Nursing, LLC |
| 22-1942 |
| September 2, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| TORTS INJURY-Med Malpractice |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 MOTION ORDER, granting motion to hold appeal in abeyance [ # 13 ] pending the Courts disposition of Leroy v. Hume, Docket No. 21-2158(L) and Rivera-Zayas v. Our Lady of Consolation Geriatric Care Center, Docket No. 21-2164. filed by Appellant Excel at Woodbury for Rehabilitation and Nursing, LLC, opening briefs be due 60 days after issuance of a final decision in Leroy and Rivera-Zayas, by BR, FILED. [3390028][17] [22-1942] [Entered: 09/28/2022 01:00 PM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION, to hold appeal in abeyance, on behalf of Appellant Excel at Woodbury for Rehabilitation and Nursing, LLC, FILED. Service date 09/26/2022 by CM/ECF, email. [3388845] [22-1942] [Entered: 09/26/2022 04:08 PM] |
| Filing 10 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Excel at Woodbury for Rehabilitation and Nursing, LLC, FILED. Service date 09/15/2022 by CM/ECF.[3382620] [22-1942] [Entered: 09/15/2022 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 9 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Excel at Woodbury for Rehabilitation and Nursing, LLC, FILED. Service date 09/15/2022 by CM/ECF.[3382612] [22-1942] [Entered: 09/15/2022 10:28 AM] |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Excel at Woodbury for Rehabilitation and Nursing, LLC, FILED. Service date 09/15/2022 by CM/ECF.[3382510] [22-1942] [Entered: 09/15/2022 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 5 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Attorney Michael E. Duffy, Esq. for Respondent Veena Suri, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED.[3376745] [22-1942] [Entered: 09/06/2022 11:36 AM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3376737] [22-1942] [Entered: 09/06/2022 11:30 AM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Excel at Woodbury for Rehabilitation and Nursing, LLC, USCA receipt # ANYEDC-15905001, FILED.[3376735] [22-1942] [Entered: 09/06/2022 11:29 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER OF REMAND, dated 08/09/2022, RECEIVED.[3376731] [22-1942] [Entered: 09/06/2022 11:28 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Excel at Woodbury for Rehabilitation and Nursing, LLC, FILED. [3376724] [22-1942] [Entered: 09/06/2022 11:23 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Suri v. Excel at Woodbury for Rehabilitation and Nursing | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Veena Suri, as Proposed Executrix of the Estate of, Gireesh K. Suri, Deceased | |
| Represented By: | Michael E. Duffy Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: Excel at Woodbury for Rehabilitation and Nursing, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Megan Alice Lawless Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
