Johnson v. Motel 6
| Robert W. Johnson |
| Jefferson County Department of Social Services, Pro Se Government, Deborah Labadini, Pro Se Government Employee, The Workplace, Pro Se Government, Tracy Eveleigh, Pro Se Government, M. Burns, Pro Se Government Employee, Kathy Hochul, Pro Se Government Employee, Robert J. Rodriguez, Pro Se Government Employee, Georgeann Stevenson, Pro Se Government Employee, Motel 6, Pro Se Corporation and Mr. Patel, Pro Se Corporation |
| 22-1946 |
| September 1, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER, dated 09/06/2022, dismissing appeal by 09/27/2022, unless Petitioner Robert W. Johnson, submits a motion for leave to file, copy to pro se petitioner, FILED.[3377165] [22-1946] [Entered: 09/06/2022 04:24 PM]
|
| Filing 9 SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3377171] [22-1946] [Entered: 09/06/2022 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 8 AMENDED NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, and district court docket, on behalf of Petitioner Robert W. Johnson, RECEIVED.[3377170] [22-1946] [Entered: 09/06/2022 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 08/02/2022, RECEIVED.[3377156] [22-1946] [Entered: 09/06/2022 04:21 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 06/01/2022, RECEIVED.[3377155] [22-1946] [Entered: 09/06/2022 04:21 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, and district court docket, on behalf of Petitioner Robert W. Johnson, RECEIVED.[3377154] [22-1946] [Entered: 09/06/2022 04:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
