Tasfay v. Ramos
| Department of Homeless Services |
| Jama M. Tasfay and Desmond Rolle |
| Melissa Ramos, Acacia, Johani Vialet-Rodriguez, Acacia Director and Nadia DiSalvo, DHS Police Sergeant |
| 22-2000 |
| September 13, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| CIVIL RIGHTS-Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 35 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Desmond Rolle and Jama M. Tasfay, FILED. Service date 11/07/2022 by US mail.[3416628] [22-2000] [Entered: 11/08/2022 07:18 PM] |
| Filing 34 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Desmond Rolle and Jama M. Tasfay, FILED. Service date 11/07/2022 by US mail.[3416627] [22-2000] [Entered: 11/08/2022 07:17 PM] |
| Filing 33 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D-P, [28], on behalf of Appellant Desmond Rolle and Jama M. Tasfay, copy to pro se appellants, FILED.[3405776] [22-2000] [Entered: 10/21/2022 05:51 PM] |
| Filing 32 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, [27], on behalf of Appellant Desmond Rolle and Jama M. Tasfay, copy to pro se appellants, FILED.[3405771] [22-2000] [Entered: 10/21/2022 05:39 PM] |
| Filing 26 STRIKE ORDER, striking Appellant Desmond Rolle Motion, to proceed in forma pauperis, [ # 6 ] from the docket, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3405748] [22-2000] [Entered: 10/21/2022 05:02 PM] |
| Filing 30 UNDELIVERABLE MAIL, to USCA from USPS, for Desmond Rolle. Insufficient address, unable to forward, RECEIVED.[3405764] [22-2000] [Entered: 10/21/2022 05:26 PM] |
| Filing 29 UNDELIVERABLE MAIL, to USCA from USPS, for Desmond Rolle. Insufficient address, unable to forward, RECEIVED.[3405761] [22-2000] [Entered: 10/21/2022 05:25 PM] |
| Filing 28 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Desmond Rolle and Jama M. Tasfay, FILED. Service date 10/12/2022 by email.[3405759] [22-2000] [Entered: 10/21/2022 05:23 PM] |
| Filing 27 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Desmond Rolle and Jama M. Tasfay, FILED. Service date 10/12/2022 by email.[3405757] [22-2000] [Entered: 10/21/2022 05:22 PM] |
Filing 21
ORDER, dated 10/06/2022, dismissing appeal by 10/27/2022, unless Appellant Desmond Rolle, submits Form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3394908] [22-2000] [Entered: 10/06/2022 12:22 PM]
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER, dated 10/06/2022, dismissing appeal by 10/27/2022, unless Appellant Jama M. Tasfay, submits Form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3394900] [22-2000] [Entered: 10/06/2022 12:18 PM]
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER, dated 10/06/2022, dismissing appeal by 10/27/2022, unless Appellant Jama M. Tasfay, submits an Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3394891] [22-2000] [Entered: 10/06/2022 12:11 PM]
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER, dated 10/06/2022, dismissing appeal by 10/27/2022, unless Appellant Desmond Rolle, submits an Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3394882] [22-2000] [Entered: 10/06/2022 12:06 PM]
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE, to Appellee Acacia and Johani Vialet-Rodriguez , for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[3394849] [22-2000] [Entered: 10/06/2022 11:46 AM] |
| Filing 15 ATTORNEY, Hannah J. Sarokin, [ # 11 ], in place of attorney Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix, SUBSTITUTED.[3394843] [22-2000] [Entered: 10/06/2022 11:43 AM] |
| Filing 14 CURED DEFECTIVE Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel, [ # 10 ], [ # 11 ], on behalf of Appellee Nadia DiSalvo and Melissa Ramos, FILED.[3394839] [22-2000] [Entered: 10/06/2022 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 13 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Attorney Christopher John Yee Coyne, Esq. for Appellee Acacia and Johani Vialet-Rodriguez, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED.[3394837] [22-2000] [Entered: 10/06/2022 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 12 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Attorney Mr. Christopher Aaron Seacord, Esq. for Appellee Acacia and Johani Vialet-Rodriguez, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED.[3394836] [22-2000] [Entered: 10/06/2022 11:39 AM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Nadia DiSalvo and Melissa Ramos, FILED. Service date 10/06/2022 by US mail. [3394745] [22-2000] [Entered: 10/06/2022 10:44 AM] |
| Filing 10 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel, [9], on behalf of Appellee Nadia DiSalvo and Melissa Ramos, FILED.[3389848] [22-2000] [Entered: 09/28/2022 10:27 AM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Nadia DiSalvo and Melissa Ramos, FILED. Service date 09/27/2022 by CM/ECF. [3389649] [22-2000] [Entered: 09/27/2022 05:02 PM] |
| Filing 7 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis, [ # 6 ], on behalf of Appellant Desmond Rolle, copy to pro se Appellant, FILED.[3382465] [22-2000] [Entered: 09/15/2022 09:32 AM] |
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, Jama M. Tasfay and Desmond Rolle, SENT.[3382289] [22-2000] [Entered: 09/14/2022 05:22 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Desmond Rolle and Jama M. Tasfay, FILED. No service. [3382457] [22-2000] [Entered: 09/15/2022 09:27 AM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3382288] [22-2000] [Entered: 09/14/2022 05:19 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 08/12/2022, RECEIVED.[3382287] [22-2000] [Entered: 09/14/2022 05:18 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION, dated 08/10/2022, RECEIVED.[3382285] [22-2000] [Entered: 09/14/2022 05:16 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Desmond Rolle and Jama M. Tasfay, FILED. [3382283] [22-2000] [Entered: 09/14/2022 05:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
