Rojas v. Human Resources Administration
| Carlos Rojas |
| Human Resources Administration |
| 22-2055 |
| September 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| CIVIL RIGHTS-Jobs |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 PAPERS, Copy of Appellee's notice of appearance as substitute counsel sent by appellant, RECEIVED.[3418623] [22-2055] [Entered: 11/13/2022 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 19 PAPERS, Copies of Orders sent to Appellant, RECEIVED.[3418622] [22-2055] [Entered: 11/13/2022 04:43 PM] |
| Filing 18 PAPERS, copy of docket sheet., RECEIVED.[3418621] [22-2055] [Entered: 11/13/2022 04:42 PM] |
| Filing 17 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Carlos Rojas, FILED. Service date 10/24/2022 by US mail.[3418620] [22-2055] [Entered: 11/13/2022 04:39 PM] |
| Filing 16 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Carlos Rojas, FILED. Service date 10/24/2022 by US mail.[3418619] [22-2055] [Entered: 11/13/2022 04:37 PM] |
Filing 13
ORDER, dated 10/06/2022, dismissing appeal by 10/27/2022, unless Appellant Carlos Rojas, submits Acknowledgment and notice of appearance form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3395162] [22-2055] [Entered: 10/06/2022 03:12 PM]
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER, dated 10/06/2022, dismissing appeal by 10/27/2022, unless Appellant Carlos Rojas, submits Form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3395153] [22-2055] [Entered: 10/06/2022 03:08 PM]
|
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY, Jeremy Pepper, [ # 10 ], in place of attorney Sylvia Hinds-Radix, SUBSTITUTED.[3395038] [22-2055] [Entered: 10/06/2022 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Human Resources Administration, FILED. Service date 10/06/2022 by US mail. [3394754] [22-2055] [Entered: 10/06/2022 10:48 AM] |
| Filing 7 DISTRICT COURT TEXT ORDER, dated 10/03/2022, granting IFP, RECEIVED.[3394492] [22-2055] [Entered: 10/06/2022 08:21 AM] |
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3392145] [22-2055] [Entered: 10/03/2022 09:08 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE, re: pending district court IFP motion, to district court, SENT.[3392137] [22-2055] [Entered: 10/03/2022 09:05 AM] |
| Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3386084] [22-2055] [Entered: 09/21/2022 01:13 PM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3386083] [22-2055] [Entered: 09/21/2022 01:11 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, dated 08/29/2022, RECEIVED.[3386082] [22-2055] [Entered: 09/21/2022 01:10 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Carlos Rojas, FILED. [3386078] [22-2055] [Entered: 09/21/2022 01:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Rojas v. Human Resources Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Carlos Rojas | |
| Represented By: | Carlos Rojas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Human Resources Administration | |
| Represented By: | Sylvia Hinds-Radix Esq. |
| Represented By: | Jeremy Harris Pepper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
