United States of America v. Smith
| Clinton Hill, AKA Tupac, AKA Clint, Jermaine Barnum, AKA Bones, Darquan Walker, AKA Quany, Arthur Bullock, AKA Art, Ralph Walker, AKA Eaz, Schiquan Harrison, AKA S, Marquise Scott, AKA Sem, Jerry Slaughter, AKA Hood, Keith Horton, AKA Kizza, Bryan Shepard, AKA Gadget and Quashawn Blunt, AKA Qua |
| United States of America |
| Reddell Smith, AKA Renny |
| 22-2217 |
| September 29, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee USA United States of America, FILED. Service date 10/03/2022 by CM/ECF.[3392505] [22-2217] [Entered: 10/03/2022 01:39 PM] |
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Reddell Smith, FILED. Service date 10/03/2022 by CM/ECF.[3392498] [22-2217] [Entered: 10/03/2022 01:32 PM] |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY, Rajit S. Dosanjh, [ # 4 ], in place of attorney Steven D. Clymer, SUBSTITUTED.[3392332] [22-2217] [Entered: 10/03/2022 11:13 AM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee USA United States of America, FILED. Service date 10/03/2022 by CM/ECF. [3392321] [22-2217] [Entered: 10/03/2022 11:07 AM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3392227] [22-2217] [Entered: 10/03/2022 10:07 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT AMENDED JUDGMENT, dated 08/30/2022, RECEIVED.[3392225] [22-2217] [Entered: 10/03/2022 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Reddell Smith, FILED. [3392208] [22-2217] [Entered: 10/03/2022 09:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.