Romano v. United States of America
| Joseph Romano |
| United States of America |
| 22-2224 |
| September 30, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| PRISONER PET-Sentence (2255) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, [12], on behalf of Appellant Joseph Romano, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[3416050] [22-2224] [Entered: 11/08/2022 11:29 AM] |
| Filing 13 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, motion for assignment of pro bono counsel, [11], on behalf of Appellant Joseph Romano, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[3416041] [22-2224] [Entered: 11/08/2022 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Appellant Joseph Romano, FILED. Service date 10/18/2022 by US mail.[3416040] [22-2224] [Entered: 11/08/2022 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION, for assignment of pro bono counsel, on behalf of Appellant Joseph Romano, FILED. Service date 11/10/2018 by US mail.[3416038] [22-2224] [Entered: 11/08/2022 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Nicholas J. Moscow for Appellee United States of America, in case 22-2224 , [ # 9 ], ADDED.[3408302] [22-2224] [Entered: 10/26/2022 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee United States of America, FILED. Service date 10/26/2022 by CM/ECF, US mail. [3408214] [22-2224] [Entered: 10/26/2022 01:52 PM] |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee United States of America, FILED. Service date 10/19/2022 by CM/ECF, US mail.[3403941] [22-2224] [Entered: 10/19/2022 06:27 PM] |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY, J. Matthew Haggans, [ # 6 ], in place of attorney David C. James, SUBSTITUTED.[3403107] [22-2224] [Entered: 10/19/2022 06:54 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee United States of America, FILED. Service date 10/18/2022 by CM/ECF, US mail. [3403073] [22-2224] [Entered: 10/18/2022 06:18 PM] |
| Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3392370] [22-2224] [Entered: 10/03/2022 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3392366] [22-2224] [Entered: 10/03/2022 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 08/22/2022, denying certificate of appealability, RECEIVED.[3392364] [22-2224] [Entered: 10/03/2022 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Joseph Romano, FILED. [3392358] [22-2224] [Entered: 10/03/2022 11:32 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Romano v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Joseph Romano | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Romano |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | David C. James |
| Represented By: | J. Matthew Haggans Esq. |
| Represented By: | Nicholas J. Moscow Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
