Luangpakdy v. Altra Industrial Motion Corp.
Plaintiff / Appellant: Sytason Luangpakdy
Defendant / Appellee: Altra Industrial Motion Corp., Ed Novotny, Carl R. Christenson, Tim Raymond, Diane McMullen, Denis Hadden, Cliff Gilbert and Tom Gampp
Case Number: 22-26
Filed: January 6, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: CIVIL RIGHTS-Jobs
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER, [ # 21 ] appeal dismissed for Appellant Sytason Luangpakdy failure to file form D-P, EFFECTIVE. [3270879] [22-26] [Entered: 03/03/2022 10:22 AM]
March 3, 2022 Filing 35 NEW CASE MANAGER, Margaret Lain, ASSIGNED.[3270873] [22-26] [Entered: 03/03/2022 10:19 AM]
March 3, 2022 Filing 31 CURED DEFECTIVE NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL [ # 13 ], on behalf of Appellees Altra Industrial Motion Corp. and Carl R. Christenson, FILED.[3270782] [22-26] [Entered: 03/03/2022 09:28 AM]
February 23, 2022 Filing 30 CURED DEFECTIVE ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, ORAL ARGUMENT STATEMENT, SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION [ # 26 ], [ # 27 ], [ # 28 ], on behalf of Appellant Sytason Luangpakdy, FILED.[3266158] [22-26] [Entered: 02/23/2022 02:18 PM]
February 18, 2022 Filing 29 PAPERS, statement, on behalf of Appellant Sytason Luangpakdy, RECEIVED.[3266156] [22-26] [Entered: 02/23/2022 02:16 PM]
February 18, 2022 Filing 28 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Sytason Luangpakdy, informing Court of proposed due date 05/13/2022, RECEIVED. Service date 02/17/2022 by US mail.[3266151] [22-26] [Entered: 02/23/2022 02:13 PM]
February 18, 2022 Filing 27 ORAL ARGUMENT STATEMENT LR 34.1 (a), on behalf of filer Appellant Sytason Luangpakdy, FILED. Service date 02/17/2022 by US mail. [3266147] [22-26] [Entered: 02/23/2022 02:07 PM]
February 18, 2022 Filing 26 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Appellant Sytason Luangpakdy, FILED. Service date 02/17/2022 by US mail.[3266145] [22-26] [Entered: 02/23/2022 02:04 PM]
February 1, 2022 Filing 25 CURED DEFECTIVE NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL [ # 24 ], on behalf of Appellees Altra Industrial Motion Corp. and Carl R. Christenson, FILED.[3253922] [22-26] [Entered: 02/01/2022 03:37 PM]
February 1, 2022 Filing 24 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Altra Industrial Motion Corp. and Carl R. Christenson, FILED. Service date 01/31/2022 by US mail. [3253915] [22-26] [Entered: 02/01/2022 03:29 PM]
February 1, 2022 Filing 23 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel, [22], on behalf of Appellees Altra Industrial Motion Corp. and Carl R. Christenson, FILED.[3253683] [22-26] [Entered: 02/01/2022 12:11 PM]
January 31, 2022 Filing 22 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Altra Industrial Motion Corp. and Carl R. Christenson, FILED. Service date 01/31/2022 by US mail.[3253075] [22-26] [Entered: 01/31/2022 03:46 PM]
January 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER, dated 01/31/2022, dismissing appeal by 2/22/2022, unless Appellant Sytason Luangpakdy, submits Form D-P, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[3252477] [22-26] [Entered: 01/31/2022 11:21 AM]
January 31, 2022 Filing 20 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, oral argument statement, [17], on behalf of Appellant Sytason Luangpakdy, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[3252463] [22-26] [Entered: 01/31/2022 11:15 AM]
January 31, 2022 Filing 19 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Scheduling Notification, [16], on behalf of Appellant Sytason Luangpakdy, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[3252452] [22-26] [Entered: 01/31/2022 11:10 AM]
January 31, 2022 Filing 18 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, [15], on behalf of Appellant Sytason Luangpakdy, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[3252441] [22-26] [Entered: 01/31/2022 11:03 AM]
January 28, 2022 Filing 17 ORAL ARGUMENT STATEMENT LR 34.1 (a), on behalf of filer Appellant Sytason Luangpakdy, FILED. No Service. [3252434] [22-26] [Entered: 01/31/2022 11:01 AM]
January 28, 2022 Filing 16 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Sytason Luangpakdy, informing Court of proposed due date 05/15/2022, RECEIVED. No Service.[3252381] [22-26] [Entered: 01/31/2022 10:33 AM]
January 28, 2022 Filing 15 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Appellant Sytason Luangpakdy, FILED. No Service[3252374] [22-26] [Entered: 01/31/2022 10:29 AM]
January 27, 2022 Filing 14 ATTORNEY, Christian A. Angotti for Appellees Altra Industrial Motion Corp. and Carl R. Christenson, in case 22-26 , [ # 13 ], ADDED.[3251124] [22-26] [Entered: 01/27/2022 02:04 PM]
January 27, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Altra Industrial Motion Corp. and Carl R. Christenson, FILED. Service date 01/27/2022 by US mail. [3250888] [22-26] [Entered: 01/27/2022 11:40 AM]
January 27, 2022 Filing 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Altra Industrial Motion Corp. and Carl R. Christenson, FILED. Service date 01/27/2022 by US mail.[3250786] [22-26] [Entered: 01/27/2022 10:39 AM]
January 26, 2022 Filing 11 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, notice of appearance as additional counsel, [10], on behalf of Appellees Altra Industrial Motion Corp. and Carl R. Christenson, FILED.[3250074] [22-26] [Entered: 01/26/2022 10:49 AM]
January 24, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Altra Industrial Motion Corp. and Carl R. Christenson, FILED. Service date 01/24/2022 by US mail. [3248595] [22-26] [Entered: 01/24/2022 01:08 PM]
January 24, 2022 Filing 9 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel, [8], on behalf of Appellee Altra Industrial Motion Corp., FILED.[3248340] [22-26] [Entered: 01/24/2022 09:58 AM]
January 20, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Altra Industrial Motion Corp., FILED. Service date 01/20/2022 by CM/ECF. [3247022] [22-26] [Entered: 01/20/2022 03:33 PM]
January 7, 2022 Filing 3 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3239575] [22-26] [Entered: 01/07/2022 10:25 AM]
January 6, 2022 Filing 7 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3240392] [22-26] [Entered: 01/10/2022 09:13 AM]
January 6, 2022 Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT DECISION AND ORDER, dated 12/06/2021, RECEIVED.[3239573] [22-26] [Entered: 01/07/2022 10:24 AM]
January 6, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Sytason Luangpakdy, FILED. [3239556] [22-26] [Entered: 01/07/2022 10:17 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Luangpakdy v. Altra Industrial Motion Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Sytason Luangpakdy
Represented By: Sytason Luangpakdy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Altra Industrial Motion Corp.
Represented By: Hinna Upal
Represented By: Christian A. Angotti Esq.
Represented By: Theodore A. Schroeder Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Ed Novotny
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Carl R. Christenson
Represented By: Hinna Upal
Represented By: Theodore A. Schroeder Esq.
Represented By: Christian A. Angotti Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Tim Raymond
Represented By: Hinna Upal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Diane McMullen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Denis Hadden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Cliff Gilbert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Tom Gampp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?