Cruz v. 32BJ SEIU
| Kyle Bragg and ABM Industry Groups, LLC |
| Carina Cruz |
| 32BJ SEIU |
| 22-2753 |
| October 26, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| CIVIL RIGHTS-Jobs |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 NEW CASE MANAGER, Dana Ellwood, copy to pro se appellant, ASSIGNED.[3427592] [22-2753] [Entered: 11/29/2022 11:29 AM] |
| Filing 20 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Carina Cruz, FILED. Service date 11/21/2022 by US mail.[3424075] [22-2753] [Entered: 11/22/2022 09:21 AM] |
| Filing 19 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Carina Cruz, FILED. Service date 11/21/2022 by US mail.[3424073] [22-2753] [Entered: 11/22/2022 09:20 AM] |
| Filing 18 CURED DEFECTIVE ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, [ # 12 ], [ # 14 ], [ # 17 ], on behalf of Appellee 32BJ SEIU, FILED.[3420036] [22-2753] [Entered: 11/15/2022 01:18 PM] |
| Filing 17 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee 32BJ SEIU, FILED. Service date 11/02/2022 by email.[3418842] [22-2753] [Entered: 11/14/2022 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 16 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, [15], on behalf of Appellee 32BJ SEIU, FILED.[3418727] [22-2753] [Entered: 11/14/2022 09:22 AM] |
| Filing 15 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee 32BJ SEIU, FILED. Service date 11/02/2022 by email.[3418375] [22-2753] [Entered: 11/10/2022 03:37 PM] |
| Filing 14 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, [13], on behalf of Appellee 32BJ SEIU, FILED.[3415823] [22-2753] [Entered: 11/08/2022 09:12 AM] |
| Filing 13 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee 32BJ SEIU, FILED. Service date 11/02/2022 by email.[3415400] [22-2753] [Entered: 11/07/2022 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 12 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, [11], on behalf of Appellee 32BJ SEIU, FILED.[3415204] [22-2753] [Entered: 11/07/2022 12:12 PM] |
| Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee 32BJ SEIU, FILED. Service date 11/02/2022 by email.[3414455] [22-2753] [Entered: 11/04/2022 01:24 PM] |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Andrew L. Strom, [ # 8 ], in place of attorney Katchen Locke, SUBSTITUTED.[3414054] [22-2753] [Entered: 11/04/2022 09:22 AM] |
| Filing 9 CURED DEFECTIVE NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, [ # 7 ], [ # 8 ], on behalf of Appellee 32BJ SEIU, FILED.[3414047] [22-2753] [Entered: 11/04/2022 09:19 AM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee 32BJ SEIU and Kyle Bragg, FILED. Service date 11/02/2022 by email. [3413903] [22-2753] [Entered: 11/03/2022 05:36 PM] |
| Filing 7 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel, [6], on behalf of Appellant Carina Cruz, FILED.[3413763] [22-2753] [Entered: 11/03/2022 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee 32BJ SEIU, FILED. Service date 11/02/2022 by email. [3412972] [22-2753] [Entered: 11/02/2022 04:49 PM] |
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3409675] [22-2753] [Entered: 10/28/2022 10:41 AM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3409660] [22-2753] [Entered: 10/28/2022 10:35 AM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 09/22/2022, RECEIVED.[3409648] [22-2753] [Entered: 10/28/2022 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 09/21/2022, RECEIVED.[3409643] [22-2753] [Entered: 10/28/2022 10:28 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Carina Cruz, FILED. [3409630] [22-2753] [Entered: 10/28/2022 10:23 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
