Tripathy v. Feuz
| Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, New York State Board of Parole, New York State Board of Examiners for Sex Offenders and State of New York |
| Sanjay Tripathy |
| Maria Feuz, Social Worker, Jaqueline Reid, Sex Offender Rehabilitation Counselor, Luis Gonzalez, Assistant Deputy Superintendent of Programs, Fishkill Correctional Facility, John Wood, Deputy Superintendent of Programs, Fishkill Correctional Facility, Edward Burnett, Superintendent, Fishkill Correctional Facility, Jeff McKoy, Deputy Commissioner of Programs, Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Tina M. Stanford, Chairperson, New York State of Parole, Michele Harrington, Chairsperson, New York State Board of Examiners Sex Offenders, Kathy Hochul, Governor of the State of New York, Ryan Brotz, Psychologist, SOCTP, Brian Mcallister, Director of the DOCCS Sex Offender Counseling and Treatment Program and Anthony Annucci, Acting Commissioner of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision |
| 22-2845 |
| November 3, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| CIVIL RIGHTS-Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 34 NEW CASE MANAGER, Ralph Obas, ASSIGNED.[3442989] [22-2845] [Entered: 12/27/2022 12:19 PM] |
| Filing 32 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 12/27/2022, determining the appeal to SDNY, ISSUED.[Mandate][3442984] [22-2845] [Entered: 12/27/2022 12:18 PM] |
| Filing 31 MOTION ORDER, granting motion to withdraw appeal [ # 27 ] filed by Appellant Mr. Sanjay Tripathy, FILED. [3442983][31] [22-2845] [Entered: 12/27/2022 12:17 PM] |
| Filing 28 CURED DEFECTIVE Motion, to withdraw appeal [ # 26 ], [ # 27 ], on behalf of Appellant Mr. Sanjay Tripathy, FILED.[3442860] [22-2845] [Entered: 12/27/2022 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 27 MOTION, to withdraw appeal, on behalf of Appellant Mr. Sanjay Tripathy, FILED. Service date 12/27/2022 by CM/ECF. [3442734] [22-2845] [Entered: 12/27/2022 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 26 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, to withdraw appeal, [25], on behalf of Appellant Mr. Sanjay Tripathy, FILED.[3442705] [22-2845] [Entered: 12/27/2022 09:36 AM] |
| Filing 25 MOTION, to withdraw appeal, on behalf of Appellant Mr. Sanjay Tripathy, FILED. Service date 12/25/2022 by CM/ECF, email. [3442541] [22-2845] [Entered: 12/25/2022 01:11 PM] |
| Filing 24 ATTORNEY, David Lawrence III, [ # 23 ], in place of attorney Barbara D. Underwood, SUBSTITUTED.[3442076] [22-2845] [Entered: 12/22/2022 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 23 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Anthony Annucci, Ryan Brotz, Edward Burnett, Maria Feuz, Luis Gonzalez, Michele Harrington, Kathy Hochul, Brian Mcallister, Jeff McKoy, Jaqueline Reid and John Wood, FILED. Service date 12/22/2022 by US mail. [3441766] [22-2845] [Entered: 12/22/2022 10:08 AM] |
| Filing 22 NOTICE, to Appellees Anthony Annucci, Ryan Brotz, Edward Burnett, Maria Feuz, Luis Gonzalez, Michele Harrington, Kathy Hochul, Jeff McKoy, Brian Mcallister, Jaqueline Reid, Tina M. Stanford and John Wood , for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[3440765] [22-2845] [Entered: 12/20/2022 09:15 PM] |
Filing 21
ORDER, dated 12/20/2022, dismissing appeal by 01/10/2022, unless Appellant Sanjay Tripathy, submits fee or moves for in forma pauperis, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3440764] [22-2845] [Entered: 12/20/2022 09:09 PM]
|
| Filing 20 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, motion, for enbanc hearing, [19], on behalf of Appellant Sanjay Tripathy, FILED.[3436936] [22-2845] [Entered: 12/14/2022 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 15 ADDRESS CHANGE REQUEST, dated 11/23/22, COMPLETED.[3429967] [22-2845] [Entered: 12/02/2022 09:01 AM] |
| Filing 19 MOTION, for enbanc hearing, on behalf of Appellant Sanjay Tripathy, FILED. Service date 11/14/2022 by US mail.[3436932] [22-2845] [Entered: 12/14/2022 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 14 LETTER, dated 11/23/2022, informing the Court of an address change, on behalf of Appellant Sanjay Tripathy, RECEIVED. No Service.[3429959] [22-2845] [Entered: 12/02/2022 08:56 AM] |
| Filing 13 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Sanjay Tripathy, informing Court of proposed due date 02/13/2023, RECEIVED. Service date 11/14/2022 by US mail.[3429931] [22-2845] [Entered: 12/02/2022 08:34 AM] |
| Filing 12 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Sanjay Tripathy, FILED. Service date 11/14/2022 by US mail.[3429929] [22-2845] [Entered: 12/02/2022 08:32 AM] |
| Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Sanjay Tripathy, FILED. Service date 11/14/2022 by US mail.[3429928] [22-2845] [Entered: 12/02/2022 08:30 AM] |
| Filing 10 FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3420624] [22-2845] [Entered: 11/16/2022 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DUPLICATE APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Sanjay Tripathy, FILED. [3419033] [22-2845] [Entered: 11/14/2022 11:51 AM] |
| Filing 8 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED.[3414291] [22-2845] [Entered: 11/04/2022 11:30 AM] |
| Filing 7 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3414277] [22-2845] [Entered: 11/04/2022 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3414263] [22-2845] [Entered: 11/04/2022 11:12 AM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 10/26/2022, RECEIVED.[3414259] [22-2845] [Entered: 11/04/2022 11:10 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 10/24/2022, RECEIVED.[3414257] [22-2845] [Entered: 11/04/2022 11:09 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Sanjay Tripathy, FILED. [3414248] [22-2845] [Entered: 11/04/2022 11:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
