Hicks v. Bail
| Timmy Hicks |
| Ned Bail, Kentucky Retired Senator, United States of America and John Doe |
| 22-2921 |
| November 9, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| TORTS INJURY-Other Personal |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER, dated 12/19/2022, dismissing appeal by 01/09/2023, unless appellant Timmy Hicks, submits form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3439379] [22-2921] [Entered: 12/19/2022 11:15 AM]
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER, dated 12/19/2022, dismissing appeal by 01/09/2023, unless appellant Timmy Hicks, submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3439371] [22-2921] [Entered: 12/19/2022 11:09 AM]
|
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Tiffany H. Lee, for United States of America, TERMINATED.[3420238] [22-2921] [Entered: 11/15/2022 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 6 LETTER, on behalf of Appellee United States of America, informing the Court the United States Attorney for the Western District of New York will not be entering an appearance or filing a brief for any party in the above-referenced appellate matter, RECEIVED. Service date 11/14/2022 by CM/ECF, US mail.[3418920] [22-2921] [Entered: 11/14/2022 10:55 AM] |
| Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3418794] [22-2921] [Entered: 11/14/2022 09:55 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 05/25/2017, RECEIVED.[3418786] [22-2921] [Entered: 11/14/2022 09:54 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Timmy Hicks, FILED. [3418762] [22-2921] [Entered: 11/14/2022 09:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
