JiRau v. Hein
Defendant: Rollin Cook
Plaintiff / Appellant: Christopher JiRau
Defendant / Appellee: Nathan Hein
Case Number: 22-293
Filed: February 11, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: PRISONER PET-Prison Condition
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 11, 2022 Filing 14 STRIKE ORDER, striking Appellant Christopher JiRau, Motion for Assignment of pro bono counsel, [ # 7 ] from the docket, copy sent to pro se appellant, FILED.[3294844] [22-293] [Entered: 04/11/2022 04:22 PM]
April 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER, dated 04/11/2022, dismissing appeal by 05/02/2022, unless Appellant Christopher JiRau, submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, copy sent to pro se appellant, FILED.[3294579] [22-293] [Entered: 04/11/2022 12:51 PM]
April 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER, dated 04/11/2022, dismissing appeal by 05/02/2022, unless Appellant Christopher JiRau, submits a Signed Prisoner Authorization form, copy sent to pro se appellant, FILED.[3294574] [22-293] [Entered: 04/11/2022 12:46 PM]
February 16, 2022 Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Lisamaria Proscino, [ # 8 ], in place of attorney Clare E. Kindall, SUBSTITUTED.[3262163] [22-293] [Entered: 02/16/2022 08:39 AM]
February 15, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Nathan Hein, FILED. Service date 02/15/2022 by CM/ECF, US mail. [3261845] [22-293] [Entered: 02/15/2022 03:34 PM]
February 14, 2022 Filing 7 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion for assignment of pro bono counsel, [4], on behalf of Appellant Christopher JiRau, copy sent to pro se appellant, FILED.[3260270] [22-293] [Entered: 02/14/2022 09:14 AM]
February 14, 2022 Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3260265] [22-293] [Entered: 02/14/2022 09:11 AM]
February 14, 2022 Filing 5 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED.[3260263] [22-293] [Entered: 02/14/2022 09:10 AM]
February 11, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION, for assignment of pro bono counsel, on behalf of Appellant Christopher JiRau, FILED. Service date 02/11/2022 by US mail.[3260262] [22-293] [Entered: 02/14/2022 09:09 AM]
February 11, 2022 Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3260255] [22-293] [Entered: 02/14/2022 09:07 AM]
February 11, 2022 Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 01/14/2022, RECEIVED.[3260253] [22-293] [Entered: 02/14/2022 09:07 AM]
February 11, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Christopher JiRau, FILED. [3260249] [22-293] [Entered: 02/14/2022 09:03 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: JiRau v. Hein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Christopher JiRau
Represented By: Christopher JiRau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Nathan Hein
Represented By: Lisamaria Proscino Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rollin Cook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?