Neske v. Carranza
| Dorothy Neske, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of A.N. and Christopher Neske, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of A.N. |
| New York City Department of Education and Chancellor of DOE Meisha Porter |
| 22-2962 |
| November 17, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Christopher Neske and Dorothy Neske Brief due date as 02/15/2023. Joint Appendix due date as 02/15/2023, FILED.[3449199] [22-2962] [Entered: 01/09/2023 04:56 PM] |
| Filing 25 NEW CASE MANAGER, Wilson Dudley, ASSIGNED.[3449190] [22-2962] [Entered: 01/09/2023 04:47 PM] |
| Filing 20 CURED DEFECTIVE Form C, [ # 16 ], [ # 18 ], on behalf of Appellant Christopher Neske and Dorothy Neske, FILED.[3447044] [22-2962] [Entered: 01/05/2023 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 19 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Neske and Dorothy Neske, informing Court of proposed due date 02/15/2023, RECEIVED. Service date 01/04/2023 by CM/ECF.[3446792] [22-2962] [Entered: 01/04/2023 10:19 PM] |
| Filing 18 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Neske and Dorothy Neske, FILED. Service date 01/04/2023 by CM/ECF.[3446791] [22-2962] [Entered: 01/04/2023 10:14 PM] |
| Filing 17 ORAL ARGUMENT STATEMENT LR 34.1 (a), on behalf of filer Attorney Ashleigh C. Rousseau, Esq. for Appellant Christopher Neske and Dorothy Neske, FILED. Service date 12/21/2022 by CM/ECF. [3441270] [22-2962] [Entered: 12/21/2022 01:37 PM] |
| Filing 16 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form C, [15], on behalf of Appellant Christopher Neske and Dorothy Neske, FILED.[3441269] [22-2962] [Entered: 12/21/2022 01:37 PM] |
| Filing 15 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Neske and Dorothy Neske, FILED. Service date 12/21/2022 by CM/ECF.[3441247] [22-2962] [Entered: 12/21/2022 01:19 PM] |
| Filing 14 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Neske and Dorothy Neske, FILED. Service date 12/21/2022 by CM/ECF.[3441245] [22-2962] [Entered: 12/21/2022 01:18 PM] |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY, Rory Jude Bellantoni for Christopher Neske Dorothy Neske, in case 22-2962, [ # 11 ], ADDED.[3427459] [22-2962] [Entered: 11/29/2022 10:08 AM] |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY, Rebecca Visgaitis, [ # 9 ], in place of attorney Sylvia Hinds-Radix, SUBSTITUTED.[3427450] [22-2962] [Entered: 11/29/2022 10:05 AM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Neske and Dorothy Neske, FILED. Service date 11/28/2022 by CM/ECF. [3427245] [22-2962] [Entered: 11/28/2022 06:36 PM] |
| Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Neske and Dorothy Neske, FILED. Service date 11/28/2022 by CM/ECF.[3427242] [22-2962] [Entered: 11/28/2022 06:25 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee New York City Department of Education and Meisha Porter, FILED. Service date 11/28/2022 by CM/ECF. [3427188] [22-2962] [Entered: 11/28/2022 04:56 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3422913] [22-2962] [Entered: 11/18/2022 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Neske and Dorothy Neske, district court receipt # ANYSDC-26971280, FILED.[3422911] [22-2962] [Entered: 11/18/2022 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 11/01/2022, RECEIVED.[3422909] [22-2962] [Entered: 11/18/2022 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Neske and Dorothy Neske, FILED. [3422901] [22-2962] [Entered: 11/18/2022 03:59 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
