LaTouche v. Graham
| Valery LaTouche |
| Superintendent Harold D. Graham, Auburn Correctional Facility |
| 22-3017 |
| November 28, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| PRISONER PET-Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, [11], on behalf of Appellant Valery LaTouche, copy sent to pro se appellant, FILED.[3456000] [22-3017] [Entered: 01/20/2023 12:06 PM] |
| Filing 13 APPENDIX, volume 1 of 1, (pp. 1-4), on behalf of Appellant Valery LaTouche, FILED. Service date 01/12/2023 by US mail.[3455998] [22-3017] [Entered: 01/20/2023 12:05 PM] |
| Filing 12 BRIEF, on behalf of Appellant Valery LaTouche, FILED. Service date 01/12/2023 by US mail. [3455992] [22-3017] [Entered: 01/20/2023 12:02 PM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Valery LaTouche, FILED. Service date 01/12/2023 by US mail.[3455988] [22-3017] [Entered: 01/20/2023 12:02 PM] |
| Filing 10 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Valery LaTouche, FILED. Service date 01/12/2023 by US mail.[3455985] [22-3017] [Entered: 01/20/2023 12:01 PM] |
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Valery LaTouche, FILED. Service date 01/12/2023 by US mail.[3455979] [22-3017] [Entered: 01/20/2023 11:59 AM] |
Filing 8
ORDER, dated 01/03/2023, stating this appeal may be subject to dismissal by 01/24/2023, unless Appellant Valery LaTouche, submits an Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, copy sent to pro se appellant, FILED.[3445359] [22-3017] [Entered: 01/03/2023 12:10 PM]
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER, dated 01/03/2023, stating this appeal may be subject to dismissal by 01/24/2023, unless Appellant Valery LaTouche, moves for certificate of appealability, copy sent to pro se appellant, FILED.[3445353] [22-3017] [Entered: 01/03/2023 12:05 PM]
|
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Harold D. Graham, FILED. Service date 12/02/2022 by CM/ECF.[3430420] [22-3017] [Entered: 12/02/2022 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3427742] [22-3017] [Entered: 11/29/2022 01:04 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3427735] [22-3017] [Entered: 11/29/2022 01:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 11/09/2022, RECEIVED.[3427712] [22-3017] [Entered: 11/29/2022 12:47 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Valery LaTouche, FILED. [3427699] [22-3017] [Entered: 11/29/2022 12:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: LaTouche v. Graham | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Valery LaTouche | |
| Represented By: | Valery LaTouche |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: Superintendent Harold D. Graham, Auburn Correctional Facility | |
| Represented By: | Carrie A. Ciganek |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
