Granger v. Artus
Petitioner / Appellant: Elie Granger
Respondent / Appellee: Dale Artus
Case Number: 22-3044
Filed: November 30, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: PRISONER PET-Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2023 Filing 21 MOTION, for probable cause, on behalf of Appellant Elie Granger, FILED. Service date 12/29/2022 by US mail.[3447832] [22-3044] [Entered: 01/06/2023 09:15 AM]
December 16, 2022 Filing 17 MOTION ORDER, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is DENIED without prejudice to renewal, [ # 11 ] filed by Appellant Elie Granger, copy sent to pro se appellant, FILED. [3438646][17] [22-3044] [Entered: 12/16/2022 01:30 PM]
December 16, 2022 Filing 12 CURED DEFECTIVE MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPELABILITY, [ # 7 ], [ # 10 ], on behalf of Appellant Elie Granger, FILED.[3438268] [22-3044] [Entered: 12/16/2022 09:58 AM]
December 15, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION, for Mandamus relief, on behalf of Appellant Elie Granger, FILED. Service date 12/07/2022 by US mail.[3438266] [22-3044] [Entered: 12/16/2022 09:57 AM]
December 15, 2022 Filing 10 MOTION, for certificate of appealability, on behalf of Appellant Elie Granger, FILED. Service date 12/07/2022 by US mail.[3438262] [22-3044] [Entered: 12/16/2022 09:56 AM]
December 15, 2022 Filing 9 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Elie Granger, FILED. Service date 12/07/2022 by US mail.[3438261] [22-3044] [Entered: 12/16/2022 09:55 AM]
December 15, 2022 Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Elie Granger, FILED. Service date 12/07/2022 by US mail.[3438258] [22-3044] [Entered: 12/16/2022 09:54 AM]
December 2, 2022 Filing 7 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion for certificate of appelability, [6], on behalf of Appellant Elie Granger, copy sent to pro se appellant, FILED.[3430161] [22-3044] [Entered: 12/02/2022 11:02 AM]
December 2, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION, for certificate of appealability, on behalf of Appellant Elie Granger, FILED. Service date 11/17/2022 by US mail.[3430157] [22-3044] [Entered: 12/02/2022 11:00 AM]
December 1, 2022 Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3429392] [22-3044] [Entered: 12/01/2022 11:47 AM]
November 30, 2022 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3429388] [22-3044] [Entered: 12/01/2022 11:44 AM]
November 30, 2022 Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 11/07/2022, RECEIVED.[3429386] [22-3044] [Entered: 12/01/2022 11:42 AM]
November 30, 2022 Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 08/10/2022, RECEIVED.[3429383] [22-3044] [Entered: 12/01/2022 11:41 AM]
November 30, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Elie Granger, FILED. [3429375] [22-3044] [Entered: 12/01/2022 11:37 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Granger v. Artus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Elie Granger
Represented By: Elie Granger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Dale Artus
Represented By: Merri Turk Lasky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?