Quizphe v. McGuiness
| Fredy Quizphe |
| Thomas McGuiness |
| 22-3053 |
| November 30, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| PRISONER PET-Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER, dated 01/24/2023, appeal may be subject to dismissal by 02/14/2023, unless Appellant Fredy Quizphe, submits an Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[3457249] [22-3053] [Entered: 01/24/2023 07:28 AM]
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER, dated 01/24/2023, appeal may be subject to dismissal by 02/14/2023, unless Appellant Fredy Quizphe, moves for certificate of appealability, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[3457248] [22-3053] [Entered: 01/24/2023 07:24 AM]
|
| Filing 12 STRIKE ORDER, striking Appellant Fredy Quizphe's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 4 ] from the docket, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[3457247] [22-3053] [Entered: 01/24/2023 07:18 AM] |
| Filing 11 STRIKE ORDER, striking Appellant Fredy Quizphe motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9 ] from the docket, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[3457246] [22-3053] [Entered: 01/24/2023 07:15 AM] |
| Filing 10 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, motion for certificate of appealability, [ # 9 ], on behalf of Appellant Fredy Quizphe, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[3432649] [22-3053] [Entered: 12/07/2022 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Thomas McGuiness, FILED. Service date 12/06/2022 by US mail.[3432174] [22-3053] [Entered: 12/06/2022 05:08 PM] |
| Filing 6 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, motion to proceed in forma pauperis, [4], on behalf of Appellant Fredy Quizphe, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[3429926] [22-3053] [Entered: 12/02/2022 08:26 AM] |
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3429925] [22-3053] [Entered: 12/02/2022 08:22 AM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION, for certificate of appealability, on behalf of Appellant Fredy Quizphe, FILED. Service date 11/17/2022 by US mail.[3432642] [22-3053] [Entered: 12/07/2022 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3429930] [22-3053] [Entered: 12/02/2022 08:32 AM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Fredy Quizphe, FILED. No Service.[3429922] [22-3053] [Entered: 12/02/2022 08:21 AM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 10/06/2022, RECEIVED.[3429920] [22-3053] [Entered: 12/02/2022 08:17 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 10/05/2022, denying certificate of appealability, RECEIVED.[3429919] [22-3053] [Entered: 12/02/2022 08:15 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Fredy Quizphe, FILED. [3429918] [22-3053] [Entered: 12/02/2022 08:10 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Quizphe v. McGuiness | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Fredy Quizphe | |
| Represented By: | Fredy Quizphe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: Thomas McGuiness | |
| Represented By: | Andrew R. Kass |
| Represented By: | Barbara D. Underwood |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
