Lewis v. Bartosh
| Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, (ATF), United States Marshals Service, (USMS), Howard Stern, Bureau of Alcohol Firearm and Explosives (ATF), Ayesha Winston, Bureau of Alcohol Firearm and Explosives (ATF), Patrick Donahue, United States Marshal Service (USMS) and Sandy Rao, United States Marshal Service (USMS) |
| Oswald A. Lewis |
| Christopher Bartosh, Deputy U.S. Marshal Brian Banks, Deputy Ryan Thomas Westfield, Deputy Robert Ledogar and Deputy Antony Dineen |
| 22-3060 |
| November 30, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| PRISONER PET-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 35 SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3452800] [22-3060] [Entered: 01/17/2023 07:53 AM] |
| Filing 30 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Oswald A. Lewis, district court receipt # 100003932, FILED.[3450033] [22-3060] [Entered: 01/10/2023 05:09 PM] |
| Filing 29 MOTION ORDER, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED to the extent that the filing fee paid on January 5, 2023 for this appeal is considered timely. Appellants motion arguing the district court abused its discretion is REFERRED to the panel that will determine the merits of this appeal. [ # 20 ] [ # 20 ] [ # 24 ], copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [3450023][29] [22-3060] [Entered: 01/10/2023 04:57 PM] |
| Filing 26 CURED DEFECTIVE MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO SUBMIT FILING FEE [ # 23 ], [ # 24 ], on behalf of Appellant Oswald A. Lewis, FILED.[3444424] [22-3060] [Entered: 12/29/2022 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 25 PAPERS, defective document notice at entry 23, RECEIVED.[3444422] [22-3060] [Entered: 12/29/2022 12:07 PM] |
| Filing 24 MOTION, to extend time to submit filing fee, on behalf of Appellant Oswald A. Lewis, FILED. Service date 12/05/2022 by US mail.[3444421] [22-3060] [Entered: 12/29/2022 12:06 PM] |
| Filing 23 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, to extend time to submit filing fee, [21], on behalf of Appellant Oswald A. Lewis, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3438572] [22-3060] [Entered: 12/16/2022 12:41 PM] |
| Filing 22 PAPERS, docketing notice and notice of record on appeal, RECEIVED.[3438562] [22-3060] [Entered: 12/16/2022 12:38 PM] |
| Filing 21 MOTION, to extend time to submit filing fee, on behalf of Appellant Oswald A. Lewis, FILED. Service date 12/05/2022 by US mail.[3438559] [22-3060] [Entered: 12/16/2022 12:35 PM] |
| Filing 20 MOTION, for abuse of discretion, to vacate, void District Courts order, on behalf of Appellant Oswald A. Lewis, FILED. Service date 12/05/2022 by US mail.[3438549] [22-3060] [Entered: 12/16/2022 12:33 PM] |
| Filing 19 ORAL ARGUMENT STATEMENT LR 34.1 (a), on behalf of filer Appellant Oswald A. Lewis, FILED. Service date 12/05/2022 by US mail. [3438544] [22-3060] [Entered: 12/16/2022 12:30 PM] |
| Filing 18 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Oswald A. Lewis, informing Court of proposed due date 02/22/2023, RECEIVED. Service date 12/05/2022 by US mail.[3438543] [22-3060] [Entered: 12/16/2022 12:29 PM] |
| Filing 17 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Oswald A. Lewis, FILED. Service date 12/05/2022 by US mail.[3438540] [22-3060] [Entered: 12/16/2022 12:28 PM] |
| Filing 16 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Appellant Oswald A. Lewis, FILED. Service date 12/05/2022 by US mail.[3438539] [22-3060] [Entered: 12/16/2022 12:27 PM] |
| Filing 15 ATTORNEY, Melanie M. Speight for Ryan Thomas Westfield, Christopher Bartosh, Antony Dineen, Brian Banks and Robert Ledogar, in case 22-3060, [ # 12 ], ADDED.[3433733] [22-3060] [Entered: 12/09/2022 08:37 AM] |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY, Matthew Modafferi for Ryan Thomas Westfield, Christopher Bartosh, Antony Dineen, Brian Banks and Robert Ledogar, in case 22-3060, [ # 11 ], ADDED.[3433731] [22-3060] [Entered: 12/09/2022 08:34 AM] |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY, Kevan Cleary for Ryan Thomas Westfield, Christopher Bartosh, Antony Dineen, Brian Banks and Robert Ledogar, in case 22-3060, [ # 10 ], ADDED.[3433730] [22-3060] [Entered: 12/09/2022 08:32 AM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Christopher Bartosh, Brian Banks, Ryan Thomas Westfield, Robert Ledogar and Antony Dineen, FILED. Service date 12/07/2022 by US mail. [3432671] [22-3060] [Entered: 12/07/2022 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Christopher Bartosh, Brian Banks, Ryan Thomas Westfield, Robert Ledogar and Antony Dineen, FILED. Service date 12/07/2022 by US mail. [3432624] [22-3060] [Entered: 12/07/2022 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Christopher Bartosh, Brian Banks, Ryan Thomas Westfield, Robert Ledogar and Antony Dineen, FILED. Service date 12/07/2022 by US mail. [3432515] [22-3060] [Entered: 12/07/2022 12:10 PM] |
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Christopher Bartosh, Brian Banks, Ryan Thomas Westfield, Robert Ledogar and Antony Dineen, FILED. Service date 12/07/2022 by US mail.[3432304] [22-3060] [Entered: 12/07/2022 09:32 AM] |
| Filing 7 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED.[3430455] [22-3060] [Entered: 12/02/2022 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3430383] [22-3060] [Entered: 12/02/2022 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3430378] [22-3060] [Entered: 12/02/2022 02:05 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, dated 11/14/2022, RECEIVED.[3430375] [22-3060] [Entered: 12/02/2022 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Oswald A. Lewis, FILED. [3430363] [22-3060] [Entered: 12/02/2022 01:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
