Chen v. Mount Sinai Beth Israel
| Victor C. Chen |
| Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York State, The USA, Yale University, Oxford University, Queen Elizabeth II, of the U.K. and Harvard University |
| 22-383 |
| February 24, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| CIVIL RIGHTS-Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 28 CAPTION, as to Harvard University, AMENDED.[3300944] [22-383] [Entered: 04/21/2022 08:59 AM] |
| Filing 27 NEW PARTY, Appellee Harvard University, ADDED.[3300939] [22-383] [Entered: 04/21/2022 08:58 AM] |
| Filing 26 LETTER, dated 04/18/2022, on behalf of Appellant Victor C. Chen, regarding scheduling order, RECEIVED. Service date 04/18/2022 by US mail.[3300889] [22-383] [Entered: 04/21/2022 08:27 AM] |
Filing 25
ORDER, dated 04/06/2022, setting 06/23/2022 as Appellant's brief due date, copy to pro se, FILED.[3292355] [22-383] [Entered: 04/06/2022 01:15 PM]
|
| Filing 22 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Victor C. Chen, informing Court of proposed due date 06/30/2022, RECEIVED. Service date 03/31/2022 by US mail.[3292075] [22-383] [Entered: 04/06/2022 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 21 NEW CASE MANAGER, Brenda Mojica, copy to pro se, ASSIGNED.[3286877] [22-383] [Entered: 03/29/2022 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 14 CURED DEFECTIVE ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, [ # 9 ], [ # 11 ], on behalf of Appellant Victor C. Chen, FILED.[3284698] [22-383] [Entered: 03/25/2022 09:04 AM] |
| Filing 13 LETTER, dated 03/21/2022, on behalf of Appellant Victor C. Chen, Appellant writes concerning the appeal Chen v. Mount Sinai Beth Israel et al, No. 22-383, RECEIVED. Service date 03/16/2022 by US mail.[3284696] [22-383] [Entered: 03/25/2022 09:02 AM] |
| Filing 12 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Victor C. Chen, FILED. Service date 03/16/2022 by US mail.[3284694] [22-383] [Entered: 03/25/2022 08:59 AM] |
| Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Victor C. Chen, FILED. Service date 03/16/2022 by US mail.[3284691] [22-383] [Entered: 03/25/2022 08:58 AM] |
| Filing 10 LETTER, on behalf of Appellee New York State, requesting removal of Barbara D. Underwood as counsel for the State of New York RECEIVED. Service date 03/16/2022 by US mail.[3279755] [22-383]--[Edited 03/21/2022 by HT] [Entered: 03/17/2022 12:57 PM] |
| Filing 9 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, [8], on behalf of Appellant Victor C. Chen, copy sent to pro se appellant, FILED.[3277210] [22-383] [Entered: 03/14/2022 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Victor C. Chen, FILED. Service date 03/11/2022 by US mail.[3277209] [22-383] [Entered: 03/14/2022 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 6 PAPERS, Papers for Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Victor C. Chen, RECEIVED.[3273427] [22-383] [Entered: 03/08/2022 08:53 AM] |
| Filing 5 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Victor C. Chen, district court receipt # 465401294536, FILED.[3269822] [22-383] [Entered: 03/01/2022 07:22 PM] |
| Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3268298] [22-383] [Entered: 02/28/2022 10:11 AM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3268287] [22-383] [Entered: 02/28/2022 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 03/31/2022, RECEIVED.[3268286] [22-383] [Entered: 02/28/2022 09:59 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Victor C. Chen, FILED. [3268282] [22-383] [Entered: 02/28/2022 09:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
