Gakuba v. John/Jane Doe
Peter Gakuba |
Warden John/Jane Doe |
22-385 |
February 24, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
PRISONER PET-Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Mr. Peter Gakuba, FILED. Service date 03/21/2022 by CM/ECF.[3281093] [22-385] [Entered: 03/21/2022 09:49 AM] |
Filing 23 MOTION, to consolidate appeals, on behalf of Appellant Mr. Peter Gakuba, FILED. Service date 03/21/2022 by CM/ECF. [3280960] [22-385] [Entered: 03/21/2022 02:39 AM] |
Filing 17 MOTION, to file an oversized motion, on behalf of Appellant Mr. Peter Gakuba, FILED. Service date 03/18/2022 by CM/ECF. [3280157] [22-385] [Entered: 03/18/2022 12:12 AM] |
Filing 16 MOTION, for certificate of appealability, on behalf of Appellant Mr. Peter Gakuba, FILED. Service date 03/18/2022 by CM/ECF. [3280156] [22-385] [Entered: 03/18/2022 12:01 AM] |
Filing 15 MOTION, for fee free Pacer, on behalf of Appellant Mr. Peter Gakuba, FILED. Service date 03/17/2022 by CM/ECF. [3280155] [22-385] [Entered: 03/17/2022 11:59 PM] |
Filing 14 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Mr. Peter Gakuba, FILED. Service date 03/17/2022 by CM/ECF. [3280154] [22-385] [Entered: 03/17/2022 11:55 PM] |
Filing 13 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, to proceed in forma pauperis, [12], on behalf of Appellant Mr. Peter Gakuba, FILED.[3274404] [22-385] [Entered: 03/09/2022 09:51 AM] |
Filing 12 MOTION, for fee- free Pacer, on behalf of Appellant Mr. Peter Gakuba, FILED. Service date 03/08/2022 by CM/ECF. [3273973] [22-385] [Entered: 03/08/2022 02:55 PM] |
Filing 9 MOTION ORDER, denying motion to dismiss [ # 6 ] filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Gakuba. Within 14 days of the date of this order Appellant is DIRECTED to either move for voluntary dismissal with prejudice or to file his Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, Form D-P, and either pay the filing fee or move to proceed in forma pauperis., copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [3271744][9] [22-385] [Entered: 03/04/2022 11:19 AM] |
Filing 6 MOTION, to dismiss, on behalf of Appellant Mr. Peter Gakuba, FILED. Service date 03/04/2022 by CM/ECF. [3271453] [22-385] [Entered: 03/04/2022 01:46 AM] |
Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3268334] [22-385] [Entered: 02/28/2022 10:41 AM] |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3268325] [22-385] [Entered: 02/28/2022 10:34 AM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 02/22/2022, RECEIVED.[3268321] [22-385] [Entered: 02/28/2022 10:30 AM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Mr. Peter Gakuba, FILED. [3268317] [22-385] [Entered: 02/28/2022 10:27 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Gakuba v. John/Jane Doe | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: Peter Gakuba | |
Represented By: | Peter Gakuba |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: Warden John/Jane Doe | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.