Nieves v. Best
Plaintiff / Appellant: Michael Nieves
Defendant / Appellee: Miriam R. Best, Acting Supreme Court Justice, Christopher Rivet, Assistant District Attorney, Brandon Riddle, Assistant District Attorney, Fire Marshal Philip Meagher, #38, Police Officer James Marcinek, #20371, Police Officer Rufian Arshad, #20210 and The City of New York
Case Number: 22-410
Filed: February 28, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: PRISONER PET-Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER, dated 04/19/2022, dismissing appeal by 05/11/2022, unless Appellant Michael Nieves,submits a Signed Prisoner Authorization form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3300096] [22-410] [Entered: 04/20/2022 08:31 AM]
March 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER, dated 03/22/2022, dismissing appeal by 04/12/2022, unless Appellant Michael Nieves, submits fee or moves for in forma pauperis, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3282140] [22-410] [Entered: 03/22/2022 10:54 AM]
March 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER, dated 03/22/2022, dismissing appeal by 04/12/2022, unless Appellant Michael Nieves, submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3282127] [22-410] [Entered: 03/22/2022 10:49 AM]
March 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER, dated 03/22/2022, dismissing appeal by 04/12/2022, unless Appellant Michael Nieves, submits form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3282113] [22-410] [Entered: 03/22/2022 10:42 AM]
March 10, 2022 Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Diana Lawless, [ # 7 ], in place of attorney Georgia Mary Pestana, SUBSTITUTED.[3275954] [22-410] [Entered: 03/10/2022 04:34 PM]
March 10, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee The City of New York, FILED. Service date 03/10/2022 by US mail. [3275882] [22-410] [Entered: 03/10/2022 03:56 PM]
March 2, 2022 Filing 6 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED.[3269868] [22-410] [Entered: 03/02/2022 06:27 AM]
March 2, 2022 Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3269867] [22-410] [Entered: 03/02/2022 06:25 AM]
February 28, 2022 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3269866] [22-410] [Entered: 03/02/2022 06:23 AM]
February 28, 2022 Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 01/06/2022, RECEIVED.[3269864] [22-410] [Entered: 03/02/2022 06:22 AM]
February 28, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Michael Nieves in 22-410, FILED. [3269863] [22-410, 21-3055] [Entered: 03/02/2022 06:19 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Nieves v. Best
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Michael Nieves
Represented By: Michael Nieves
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Miriam R. Best, Acting Supreme Court Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Christopher Rivet, Assistant District Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Brandon Riddle, Assistant District Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Fire Marshal Philip Meagher, #38
Represented By: Georgia Mary Pestana Esq.
Represented By: Diana Lawless Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Police Officer James Marcinek, #20371
Represented By: Georgia Mary Pestana Esq.
Represented By: Diana Lawless Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Police Officer Rufian Arshad, #20210
Represented By: Georgia Mary Pestana Esq.
Represented By: Diana Lawless Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: The City of New York
Represented By: Georgia Mary Pestana Esq.
Represented By: Diana Lawless Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?