Rosado v. Soriano
Plaintiff / Appellant: Edward Rosado
Defendant / Appellee: NYC Police Officer Amaury Soriano, Shield Number 027412. Individually and Official Capacity, NYC Police Officer John Doe One, Individually and Official Capacity, NYC Police Officer John Doe Two, Individually and Official Capacity, City of New York and NYC Police Officer Amaury Soriano, Shield Number 027412, individually and in his official capacity
Case Number: 22-48
Filed: January 10, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: CIVIL RIGHTS-Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2022 Filing 35 CAMP ORDER, Type of Conference: Amended Telephonic, Scheduled Date of Conference: 03/17/2022, Start Time: 10:30 AM, Required Attendees: Counsel, with Kathleen M. Scanlon, ENTERED.[3271204] [22-48] [Entered: 03/03/2022 02:28 PM]
January 27, 2022 Filing 33 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Edward Rosado Brief due date as 04/25/2022. Joint Appendix due date as 04/25/2022, FILED.[3250584] [22-48] [Entered: 01/27/2022 08:37 AM]
January 26, 2022 Filing 30 NEW CASE MANAGER, Ronald Willoughby, ASSIGNED.[3250457] [22-48] [Entered: 01/26/2022 04:16 PM]
January 26, 2022 Filing 29 CAPTION, parties designations changed, AMENDED.[3250439] [22-48] [Entered: 01/26/2022 03:59 PM]
January 26, 2022 Filing 26 CAMP ORDER, Type of Conference: Telephonic, Scheduled Date of Conference: 03/14/2022, Start Time: 10:30 AM, Required Attendees: Counsel, with Kathleen M. Scanlon, ENTERED.[3250243] [22-48] [Entered: 01/26/2022 12:48 PM]
January 26, 2022 Filing 23 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Edward Rosado, informing Court of proposed due date 04/25/2022, RECEIVED. Service date 01/26/2022 by CM/ECF.[3249859] [22-48] [Entered: 01/26/2022 01:35 AM]
January 26, 2022 Filing 22 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Edward Rosado, FILED. Service date 01/26/2022 by CM/ECF.[3249858] [22-48] [Entered: 01/26/2022 01:21 AM]
January 24, 2022 Filing 21 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Edward Rosado, FILED. Service date 01/24/2022 by CM/ECF.[3249019] [22-48] [Entered: 01/24/2022 10:26 PM]
January 18, 2022 Filing 20 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Edward Rosado, FILED. Service date 01/18/2022 by CM/ECF.[3244355] [22-48] [Entered: 01/18/2022 07:56 AM]
January 13, 2022 Filing 19 ATTORNEY, Scott Nathan Shorr for Amaury Soriano, in case 22-48, [ # 17 ], ADDED.[3243357] [22-48] [Entered: 01/13/2022 01:25 PM]
January 13, 2022 Filing 18 CURED DEFECTIVE NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL [ # 16 ], [ # 17 ], on behalf of Appellee Amaury Soriano, FILED.[3243356] [22-48] [Entered: 01/13/2022 01:25 PM]
January 13, 2022 Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Amaury Soriano, FILED. Service date 01/13/2022 by CM/ECF. [3243336] [22-48] [Entered: 01/13/2022 01:06 PM]
January 13, 2022 Filing 16 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel, [14], on behalf of Appellee Amaury Soriano, FILED.[3243305] [22-48] [Entered: 01/13/2022 12:37 PM]
January 13, 2022 Filing 15 ATTORNEY, Richard Paul Dearing for Amaury Soriano, in case 22-48, [ # 13 ], ADDED.[3243304] [22-48] [Entered: 01/13/2022 12:36 PM]
January 13, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Amaury Soriano, FILED. Service date 01/13/2022 by CM/ECF. [3243296] [22-48] [Entered: 01/13/2022 12:24 PM]
January 13, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Amaury Soriano, FILED. Service date 01/13/2022 by CM/ECF. [3243267] [22-48] [Entered: 01/13/2022 12:11 PM]
January 13, 2022 Filing 12 ATTORNEY, Georgia Mary Pestana, for NYC Police Officer John Doe One, NYC Police Officer John Doe Two, and City of New York, TERMINATED.[3243263] [22-48] [Entered: 01/13/2022 12:10 PM]
January 13, 2022 Filing 11 LETTER, on behalf of Appellee Amaury Soriano, informing the Court that the New York City Law Department will not be entering a Notice of Appearance for Appellees, RECEIVED. Service date 01/13/2022 by CM/ECF.[3243233] [22-48] [Entered: 01/13/2022 11:55 AM]
January 13, 2022 Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Julie Steiner, [ # 9 ], in place of attorney Georgia M. Pestana, SUBSTITUTED.[3243230] [22-48] [Entered: 01/13/2022 11:51 AM]
January 13, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Amaury Soriano, FILED. Service date 01/13/2022 by CM/ECF. [3243146] [22-48] [Entered: 01/13/2022 10:52 AM]
January 10, 2022 Filing 6 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3241036] [22-48] [Entered: 01/10/2022 03:16 PM]
January 10, 2022 Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Edward Rosado, district court receipt # BNYSDC-25558895, FILED.[3241033] [22-48] [Entered: 01/10/2022 03:15 PM]
January 10, 2022 Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 12/14/2021, RECEIVED.[3241032] [22-48] [Entered: 01/10/2022 03:15 PM]
January 10, 2022 Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, dated 12/13/2021, RECEIVED.[3241030] [22-48] [Entered: 01/10/2022 03:14 PM]
January 10, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Edward Rosado, FILED. [3241021] [22-48] [Entered: 01/10/2022 03:11 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Rosado v. Soriano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Edward Rosado
Represented By: Lawrence P. LaBrew Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NYC Police Officer Amaury Soriano, Shield Number 027412. Individually and Official Capacity
Represented By: Georgia Mary Pestana Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NYC Police Officer John Doe One, Individually and Official Capacity
Represented By: Georgia Mary Pestana Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NYC Police Officer John Doe Two, Individually and Official Capacity
Represented By: Georgia Mary Pestana Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: City of New York
Represented By: Georgia Mary Pestana Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NYC Police Officer Amaury Soriano, Shield Number 027412, individually and in his official capacity
Represented By: Richard Paul Dearing Esq.
Represented By: Scott Nathan Shorr
Represented By: Julie Steiner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?