Daniels v. 25 Lafayette Investors, LLC
Kenneth Daniels, AKA Kenneth DanielsEl |
Marilyn Daniels, AKA Marilyn Foster-Daniels, AKA Marilyn K. Daniels, AKA Marilyn K. Foster, AKA Marilyn Foster, AKA Marilyn Daniels-EL |
25 Lafayette Investors, LLC |
22-498 |
March 10, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
STATUTES-Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 NEW CASE MANAGER, Atasha Joseph, ASSIGNED.[3308194] [22-498, 22-499] [Entered: 05/03/2022 01:02 PM] |
Filing 21 ORDER, [ # 3290406-2 ] appeal dismissed for Appellant Kenneth Daniels failure to pay fee, EFFECTIVE.[3308091] [22-499] [Entered: 05/03/2022 11:57 AM] |
Filing 20 ORDER, [ # 13 ] appeal dismissed for Appellant Marilyn Daniels failure to pay fee, EFFECTIVE.[3308086] [22-498] [Entered: 05/03/2022 11:55 AM] |
Filing 13 ORDER, dated 04/04/2022, dismissing appeal by 04/25/2022, unless Appellant Marilyn Daniels, submits fee or moves for in forma pauperis, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3290393] [22-498] [Entered: 04/04/2022 02:21 PM] |
Filing 12 ORDER, dated 04/04/2022, dismissing appeal by 04/25/2022, unless Appellant Marilyn Daniels, submits form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3290381] [22-498] [Entered: 04/04/2022 02:17 PM] |
Filing 11 ORDER, dated 04/04/2022, dismissing appeal by 04/25/2022, unless Appellant Marilyn Daniels, submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3290368] [22-498] [Entered: 04/04/2022 02:09 PM] |
Filing 10 NOTE: See lead case, 22-498, containing complete set of docket entries.[3275753] [22-499] [Entered: 03/10/2022 02:36 PM] |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Kenneth Daniels, FILED. [3275733] [22-499] [Entered: 03/10/2022 02:24 PM] |
Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3275727] [22-498] [Entered: 03/10/2022 02:15 PM] |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3275725] [22-498] [Entered: 03/10/2022 02:13 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 02/17/2022, RECEIVED.[3275718] [22-498] [Entered: 03/10/2022 02:12 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Marilyn Daniels, FILED. [3275713] [22-498] [Entered: 03/10/2022 02:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Daniels v. 25 Lafayette Investors, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: Marilyn Daniels, AKA Marilyn Foster-Daniels, AKA Marilyn K. Daniels, AKA Marilyn K. Foster, AKA Marilyn Foster, AKA Marilyn Daniels-EL | |
Represented By: | Marilyn Daniels |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Kenneth Daniels, AKA Kenneth DanielsEl | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: 25 Lafayette Investors, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.