Ellis v. Riquier
| David Allen, Correctional Officer, Denny Rowe, Correctional Officer, Rick Bochardt, Hearing/Grievance Officer, Patricia Kleinsmith, Correctional Officer, Lieutenant Joe Jellick, Lieutenant Guinan, Correctional Officer Weir, John Doe 1-3, Correctional Officers, Jane Doe 1-2, Correctional Officers and John Doe 1-3, Medical Staff |
| Christopher Ellis |
| Ronald Riquier, Correctional Officer at Broome County Jail, Jason Cackowski, Correctional Officer at Broome County Jail, Brian Doyle, FKA Correctional Officer Doyal, Sergeant Jon Gillette and Lieutenant Brown Bill |
| 22-560 |
| March 16, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| PRISONER PET-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
ORDER, dated 05/10/2022, dismissing appeal by 05/31/2022, unless Appellant Christopher Ellis, submits an Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[3312152] [22-560] [Entered: 05/10/2022 11:55 AM]
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER, dated 05/10/2022, dismissing appeal by 05/31/2022, unless Appellant Christopher Ellis, submits Form D-P, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[3312140] [22-560] [Entered: 05/10/2022 11:47 AM]
|
| Filing 18 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED.[3298154] [22-560] [Entered: 04/15/2022 04:32 PM] |
| Filing 17 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3298148] [22-560] [Entered: 04/15/2022 04:29 PM] |
| Filing 13 LETTER, dated 04/08/2022, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Ellis, notifying the Court their office will no longer represent the appellant, RECEIVED. Service date 04/08/2022 by US mail.[3297964] [22-560] [Entered: 04/15/2022 02:26 PM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER, dated 04/07/2022, dismissing appeal by 4/21/2022, unless Appellant Christopher Ellis, submits an Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, FILED.[3292708] [22-560] [Entered: 04/07/2022 07:24 AM]
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER, dated 03/31/2022, dismissing appeal by 4/14/2022, unless Appellant Christopher Ellis, submits Form D, FILED.[3288471] [22-560] [Entered: 03/31/2022 08:22 AM]
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER, dated 03/31/2022, dismissing appeal by 4/14/2022, unless Appellant Christopher Ellis, submits Form C, FILED.[3288464] [22-560] [Entered: 03/31/2022 08:15 AM]
|
| Filing 8 CURED DEFECTIVE ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE [ # 7 ], on behalf of Appellees Brown Bill, Jason Cackowski, Brian Doyle, Jon Gillette and Ronald Riquier, FILED.[3288460] [22-560] [Entered: 03/31/2022 08:10 AM] |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Brown Bill, Jason Cackowski, Brian Doyle, Jon Gillette and Ronald Riquier, FILED. Service date 03/30/2022 by US mail.[3288367] [22-560] [Entered: 03/30/2022 04:34 PM] |
| Filing 6 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, [5], on behalf of Appellees Brown Bill, Jason Cackowski, Brian Doyle, Jon Gillette and Ronald Riquier, FILED.[3288311] [22-560] [Entered: 03/30/2022 03:42 PM] |
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Brown Bill, Jason Cackowski, Brian Doyle, Jon Gillette and Ronald Riquier, FILED. Service date 03/30/2022 by US mail.[3288185] [22-560] [Entered: 03/30/2022 02:12 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3280782] [22-560] [Entered: 03/18/2022 03:49 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 02/22/2022, RECEIVED.[3280778] [22-560] [Entered: 03/18/2022 03:48 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER, dated 02/22/2022, RECEIVED.[3280773] [22-560] [Entered: 03/18/2022 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Ellis, FILED. [3280766] [22-560] [Entered: 03/18/2022 03:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
