Gray v. Fidelity Investment
| Michele Gray |
| Fidelity Investments and Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC |
| 22-565 |
| March 17, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| STATUTES-Secur Comm Exchange |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 33 OPPOSITION TO , to stay [27], on behalf of Appellee Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, FILED. Service date 05/12/2022 by email, US mail. [3314346] [22-565] [Entered: 05/12/2022 05:49 PM] |
| Filing 32 CAPTION, pursuant to order at entry 30, AMENDED.[3308241] [22-565] [Entered: 05/03/2022 01:36 PM] |
| Filing 31 FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, replaced by Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, pursuant to order at entry 30, SUBSTITUTED.[3308237] [22-565] [Entered: 05/03/2022 01:33 PM] |
| Filing 30 MOTION ORDER, granting Appellee Fidelity Investments motion to amend caption [ # 25 ], copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [3308235][30] [22-565] [Entered: 05/03/2022 01:32 PM] |
| Filing 28 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, to stay, [27], on behalf of Appellant Michele Gray, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3308109] [22-565] [Entered: 05/03/2022 12:04 PM] |
| Filing 27 MOTION, to stay, on behalf of Appellant Michele Gray, FILED. Service date 05/03/2022 by US mail.[3308103] [22-565] [Entered: 05/03/2022 12:02 PM] |
| Filing 25 MOTION, to amend caption, on behalf of Appellee Fidelity Investments, FILED. Service date 04/21/2022 by email, US mail. [3301362] [22-565] [Entered: 04/21/2022 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 18 OPPOSITION TO MOTION, for award owed [ # 13 ], to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 13 ], on behalf of Appellee Fidelity Investments, FILED. Service date 04/11/2022 by email, US mail. [3294910] [22-565]--[Edited 04/12/2022 by PRM] [Entered: 04/11/2022 05:29 PM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION, for award owed, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Michele Gray, FILED. Service date 04/01/2022 by US mail.[3290081] [22-565] [Entered: 04/04/2022 10:54 AM] |
| Filing 12 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Michele Gray, FILED. Service date 04/01/2022 by US mail.[3290077] [22-565] [Entered: 04/04/2022 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Appellant Michele Gray, FILED. Service date 04/01/2022 by US mail.[3290074] [22-565] [Entered: 04/04/2022 10:50 AM] |
| Filing 10 CURED DEFECTIVE ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE [ # 8 ], [ # 9 ], on behalf of Appellee Fidelity Investments, FILED.[3288530] [22-565] [Entered: 03/31/2022 09:21 AM] |
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Fidelity Investments, FILED. Service date 03/30/2022 by email, US mail.[3288293] [22-565] [Entered: 03/30/2022 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 8 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, [7], on behalf of Appellee Fidelity Investments, FILED.[3287315] [22-565] [Entered: 03/29/2022 03:06 PM] |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Fidelity Investments, FILED. Service date 03/28/2022 by CM/ECF, email.[3286522] [22-565] [Entered: 03/28/2022 05:07 PM] |
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3281030] [22-565] [Entered: 03/21/2022 09:11 AM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3281027] [22-565] [Entered: 03/21/2022 09:10 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, entered in the district court as docket entry dated 02/28/2022, RECEIVED.[3281023] [22-565] [Entered: 03/21/2022 09:08 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Michele Gray, FILED. [3281015] [22-565] [Entered: 03/21/2022 09:04 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
