Barone v. The Lawyers Fund for Clients'
| Joseph S. Barone |
| The Lawyers Fund for Clients' Protection and Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Third Department |
| 22-58 |
| January 10, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Americans w/Disibilities Act-O |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY,Jennifer L. Clark, [ # 12 ], in place of attorney Barbara Underwood, SUBSTITUTED.[3250478] [22-58] [Entered: 01/26/2022 04:36 PM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Third Department and The Lawyers Fund for Clients' Protection, FILED. Service date 01/26/2022 by US mail. [3250144] [22-58] [Entered: 01/26/2022 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3241759] [22-58] [Entered: 01/11/2022 12:43 PM] |
| Filing 7 DISTRICT COURT JUDGEMENT, dated 12/20/2021, RECEIVED.[3241764] [22-58] [Entered: 01/11/2022 12:48 PM] |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3241753] [22-58] [Entered: 01/11/2022 12:39 PM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Joseph S. Barone, USCA receipt # ALB012304, FILED.[3241751] [22-58] [Entered: 01/11/2022 12:38 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 12/21/2021, RECEIVED.[3241733] [22-58] [Entered: 01/11/2022 12:24 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Joseph S. Barone, FILED. [3241708] [22-58] [Entered: 01/11/2022 12:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
