Richardson v. McMahon
| Rivera, Police Officer, Individual and Official Capacities, Querino Maia, Sgt., Individual and Official Capacities, Vernon Riddick, Chief, Individual and Official Capacities and Waterbury Police Department, Individual and Official Capacities |
| Jewu Richardson |
| James McMahon, City of Waterbury, Edward Mills and Juan Rivera |
| 22-582 |
| March 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| CIVIL RIGHTS-Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 ATTORNEY, Daniel Joseph Foster for City of Waterbury, Juan Rivera, Edward Mills, and James McMahon, in case 22-582, [ # 23 ], ADDED.[3288809] [22-582] [Entered: 03/31/2022 12:43 PM] |
| Filing 24 CURED DEFECTIVE NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, [ # 23 ], on behalf of Appellee City of Waterbury, James McMahon, Edward Mills and Juan Rivera, FILED.[3288806] [22-582] [Entered: 03/31/2022 12:42 PM] |
| Filing 23 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee City of Waterbury, James McMahon, Edward Mills and Juan Rivera, FILED. Service date 03/31/2022 by CM/ECF. [3288796] [22-582] [Entered: 03/31/2022 12:37 PM] |
| Filing 22 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel, [21], on behalf of Appellee City of Waterbury, James McMahon, Edward Mills and Juan Rivera, FILED.[3288771] [22-582] [Entered: 03/31/2022 12:23 PM] |
| Filing 21 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee City of Waterbury, James McMahon, Edward Mills and Juan Rivera, FILED. Service date 03/31/2022 by CM/ECF. [3288758] [22-582] [Entered: 03/31/2022 12:17 PM] |
| Filing 20 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee City of Waterbury, James McMahon, Edward Mills and Juan Rivera, FILED. Service date 03/31/2022 by CM/ECF.[3288753] [22-582] [Entered: 03/31/2022 12:13 PM] |
| Filing 19 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Jewu Richardson Brief due date as 06/24/2022. Joint Appendix due date as 06/24/2022, FILED.[3288479] [22-582] [Entered: 03/31/2022 08:41 AM] |
| Filing 16 NEW CASE MANAGER, Ronald Willoughby, ASSIGNED.[3288321] [22-582] [Entered: 03/30/2022 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 12 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Jewu Richardson, informing Court of proposed due date 06/24/2022, RECEIVED. Service date 03/29/2022 by CM/ECF.[3287478] [22-582] [Entered: 03/29/2022 04:53 PM] |
| Filing 10 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Jewu Richardson, FILED. Service date 03/29/2022 by CM/ECF.[3287473] [22-582] [Entered: 03/29/2022 04:51 PM] |
| Filing 9 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Jewu Richardson, FILED. Service date 03/29/2022 by CM/ECF.[3287472] [22-582] [Entered: 03/29/2022 04:50 PM] |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Jewu Richardson, FILED. Service date 03/29/2022 by CM/ECF.[3287377] [22-582] [Entered: 03/29/2022 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3283050] [22-582] [Entered: 03/23/2022 10:14 AM] |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Jewu Richardson, district court receipt # ACTDC-6871158, FILED.[3281817] [22-582] [Entered: 03/21/2022 05:58 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 02/28/2022, RECEIVED.[3281816] [22-582] [Entered: 03/21/2022 05:58 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT RULING, dated 02/25/2022, RECEIVED.[3281815] [22-582] [Entered: 03/21/2022 05:57 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Jewu Richardson, FILED. [3281811] [22-582] [Entered: 03/21/2022 05:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
