Furst v. Obama
| Barack Obama, President |
| Joel Ira Furst |
| Ned Lamont, Governor and State of Connecticut |
| 22-610 |
| March 23, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| CIVIL RIGHTS-Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 PAPERS, Financial Affidavit, RECEIVED.[3295704] [22-610] [Entered: 04/12/2022 06:13 PM] |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY, Michael Skold, for Ned Lamont and State of Connecticut, TERMINATED.[3293349] [22-610] [Entered: 04/07/2022 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 12 LETTER, dated 04/07/2022, on behalf of Appellees Ned Lamont and State of Connecticut, informing the Court that the Connecticut Attorney General's Office will not be representing the Appellees' in this appeal, RECEIVED. Service date 04/07/2022 by email, US mail.[3293348] [22-610] [Entered: 04/07/2022 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 11 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Joel Ira Furst, FILED. Service date 04/03/2022 by US mail.[3293272] [22-610] [Entered: 04/07/2022 02:30 PM] |
| Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Joel Ira Furst, FILED. Service date 04/03/2022 by US mail.[3293270] [22-610] [Entered: 04/07/2022 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3283588] [22-610] [Entered: 03/23/2022 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3283581] [22-610] [Entered: 03/23/2022 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 07/12/2015, RECEIVED.[3283570] [22-610] [Entered: 03/23/2022 03:57 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Joel Ira Furst, FILED. [3283557] [22-610] [Entered: 03/23/2022 03:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
