Dai v. Garland
SU JUAN DAI and JIAN CE YE |
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
22-6131 |
March 21, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 10/28/2022, determining the appeal to OIL, ISSUED.[Mandate] [Entered: 12/20/2022 10:52 AM] |
Filing 26 MOTION ORDER, granting motion to dismiss, at docket entry 21, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, by JAC, GEL, BR, FILED. [Entered: 10/28/2022 02:26 PM] |
Filing 25 NEW CASE MANAGER, Yana Segal, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 10/28/2022 02:22 PM] |
Filing 24 SUBMITTED NOTICE, to attorneys/parties, TRANSMITTED. [Entered: 10/13/2022 05:21 PM] |
Filing 23 ATTORNEY, Corey Leigh Farrell for Respondent Merrick B. Garland, ADDED. [Entered: 10/05/2022 10:45:00 AM] |
Filing 22 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Corey Leigh Farrell for Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 10/04/2022 01:17:00 PM] |
Filing 21 MOTION, to dismiss, on behalf Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 07/25/2022 12:33:00 PM] |
Filing 20 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Petitioner Su Juan Dai, Jian Ce Ye's brief due 10/19/2022, FILED. [Entered: 07/25/2022 08:11:00 AM] |
Filing 19 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Petitioner Su Juan Dai, Petitioner Jian Ce Ye, informing Court of proposed due date 10/19/2022, RECEIVED. [Entered: 07/21/2022 12:49:00 PM] |
Filing 18 TOLLING CANCELLATION ORDER, FILED. [Entered: 07/21/2022 08:33:00 AM] |
Filing 17 IMMIGRATION 90-DAY TOLLING ORDER, FILED. [Entered: 04/21/2022 11:53:00 AM] |
Filing 16 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILED [Entered: 04/19/2022 10:36:00 AM] |
Filing 15 NEW CASE MANAGER, Tynetta Wilder, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 04/07/2022 01:52:00 PM] |
Filing 14 CURED DEFECTIVE Form C-A, at entry 9, on behalf of filer Petitioner Jian Ce Ye, Petitioner Su Juan Dai, FILED. [Entered: 03/24/2022 09:56:00 AM] |
Filing 13 ATTORNEY, Lisa Marie Arnold, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, TERMINATED. [Entered: 03/23/2022 04:56:00 PM] |
Filing 12 ATTORNEY, Sarah L. Martin in place of attorney Lisa Marie Arnold, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 03/23/2022 04:55:00 PM] |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Sarah L. Martin for Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 03/22/2022 01:56:00 PM] |
Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner Su Juan Dai, Petitioner Jian Ce Ye, FILED. [Entered: 03/22/2022 01:39:00 PM] |
Filing 9 FORM C-A, on behalf of Petitioner Jian Ce Ye, Petitioner Su Juan Dai, FILED. [Entered: 03/22/2022 01:33:00 PM] |
Filing 8 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form C-A, at docket entry 4, on behalf of Petitioner Jian Ce Ye, Petitioner Su Juan Dai, FILED. [Entered: 03/22/2022 08:38:00 AM] |
Filing 7 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 03/21/2022 05:43:00 PM] |
Filing 6 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Jian Ce Ye, Petitioner Su Juan Dai,, OPENED. [Entered: 03/21/2022 05:40:00 PM] |
Filing 5 OIL for Respondent Merrick B. Garland, ADDED. [Entered: 03/21/2022 05:36:00 PM] |
Filing 4 FORM C-A, on behalf of Petitioner Jian Ce Ye, Petitioner Su Juan Dai, FILED. [Entered: 03/21/2022 05:18:00 PM] |
Filing 3 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 02/23/2022, RECEIVED. [Entered: 03/21/2022 05:12:00 PM] |
Filing 2 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of SU JUAN DAI, JIAN CE YE, USCA receipt number: A02-962-ACMS. [Entered: 03/21/2022 04:44:00 PM] |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner JIAN CE YE, Petitioner SU JUAN DAI, FILED. [Entered: 03/21/2022 11:23:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.