McCray v. Walcott
Petitioner: JOSEPH MCCRAY
Respondent: WALCOTT, SUPERINTENDENT
Case Number: 22-6148
Filed: March 29, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2022 Filing 16 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 04/26/2022, determining the appeal to EDNY, copy to pro se Petitioner, ISSUED.[Mandate] [Entered: 06/02/2022 03:17:00 PM]
April 29, 2022 Filing 15 NOTICE, Case Status, SENT. [Entered: 04/29/2022 09:14:00 AM]
April 28, 2022 Filing 14 LETTER, dated 04/22/2022, on behalf of Petitioner Joseph McCray, objecting to the Notice of Appearance for substitute counsel for Respondent, RECEIVED. [Entered: 04/29/2022 09:05:00 AM]
April 27, 2022 Filing 13 CURED DEFECTIVE Acknowledgment Notice of Appearance Form, at entry 4, 12, on behalf of Petitioner Joseph McCray, FILED. [Entered: 04/27/2022 11:28:00 AM]
April 26, 2022 Filing 11 NEW CASE MANAGER, Yenni Liu, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 04/26/2022 02:12:00 PM]
April 26, 2022 Filing 10 CERTIFIED ORDER, dated 04/26/2022, to EDNY, copy to pro se Petitioner, ISSUED. [Entered: 04/26/2022 02:08:00 PM]
April 26, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION ORDER, denying as unnecessary Second or Successive Application, at docket entry 1, on behalf of Petitioner Joseph McCray, by RSP, RCW, SLC, copy to pro se Petitioner, FILED. [Entered: 04/26/2022 01:59:00 PM]
April 25, 2022 Filing 12 AMENDED ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner Joseph McCray, FILED. [Entered: 04/27/2022 11:22:00 AM]
April 20, 2022 Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Barbara D. Underwood, on behalf of Respondent Walcott, TERMINATED. [Entered: 04/20/2022 03:56:00 PM]
April 20, 2022 Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Ann Bordley in place of attorney Barbara D. Underwood, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 04/20/2022 03:55:00 PM]
April 20, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Ann Bordley for Walcott, FILED. [Entered: 04/20/2022 02:52:00 PM]
April 12, 2022 Filing 5 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment Notice of Appearance Form, at docket entry 4, on behalf of Petitioner Joseph Mccray , FILED. [Entered: 04/12/2022 09:11:00 AM]
April 8, 2022 Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner Joseph McCray, FILED. [Entered: 04/12/2022 08:58:00 AM]
March 29, 2022 Filing 3 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 03/29/2022 12:07:00 PM]
March 29, 2022 Filing 2 APPLICATION, for Second or Successive habeas petition, on behalf of Petitioner Joseph McCray, OPENED. [Entered: 03/29/2022 12:02:00 PM]
March 29, 2022 Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING, MOTION for an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive application, on behalf of Petitioner Joseph McCray, FILED. [Entered: 03/29/2022 11:51:00 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: McCray v. Walcott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JOSEPH MCCRAY
Represented By: Joseph McCray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WALCOTT, SUPERINTENDENT
Represented By: Ann Bordley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?