Furst v. Justice
| Joel Ira Furst |
| United States Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation |
| 22-617 |
| March 23, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| CIVIL RIGHTS-Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ORAL ARGUMENT STATEMENT LR 34.1 (a), on behalf of filer Appellant Joel Ira Furst, FILED. Service date 03/31/2022 by US mail. [3292669] [22-617] [Entered: 04/06/2022 05:48 PM] |
| Filing 12 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Joel Ira Furst, informing Court of proposed due date 07/04/2022, RECEIVED. Service date 03/31/2022 by US mail.[3292668] [22-617] [Entered: 04/06/2022 05:47 PM] |
| Filing 11 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Joel Ira Furst, FILED. Service date 03/31/2022 by US mail.[3292667] [22-617] [Entered: 04/06/2022 05:46 PM] |
| Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Joel Ira Furst, FILED. Service date 03/31/2022 by US mail.[3292666] [22-617] [Entered: 04/06/2022 05:45 PM] |
| Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3283901] [22-617] [Entered: 03/24/2022 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3283900] [22-617] [Entered: 03/24/2022 10:05 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 11/19/2018, RECEIVED.[3283899] [22-617] [Entered: 03/24/2022 10:04 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Joel Ira Furst, FILED. [3283896] [22-617] [Entered: 03/24/2022 10:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
