Pun v. Garland
| BHIMRAJ PUN |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 22-6222 |
| May 6, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 NEW CASE MANAGER, Ralph Obas, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 08/03/2022 03:03:00 PM] |
| Filing 19 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 08/03/2022, determining the appeal to OIL, ISSUED.[Mandate] [Entered: 08/03/2022 02:59:00 PM] |
| Filing 18 FRAP 42(b) IMMIGRATION REMAND ORDER, remanding case to BIA, pursuant to this Court's October 16, 2012 opinion, FILED. [Entered: 08/03/2022 02:54:00 PM] |
| Filing 17 CURED DEFECTIVE motion for FRAP 42(b) immigration remand, at entry 16, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 08/03/2022 11:37:00 AM] |
| Filing 16 MOTION, for FRAP 42(b) immigration remand, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 08/03/2022 09:40:00 AM] |
| Filing 15 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, FRAP 42(b) stipulation with prejudice, at docket entry 14, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 08/03/2022 09:03:00 AM] |
| Filing 14 FRAP 42 STIPULATION, With Prejudice, RECEIVED. [Entered: 08/02/2022 01:55:41 PM] |
| Filing 13 IMMIGRATION 90-DAY TOLLING ORDER, FILED. [Entered: 06/22/2022 03:22:00 PM] |
| Filing 12 NEW CASE MANAGER, Dennisse Pizarro-Lebron, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 06/22/2022 03:11:00 PM] |
| Filing 11 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILED [Entered: 06/13/2022 09:23:00 AM] |
| Filing 10 FORM C-A, on behalf of Petitioner Bhimraj Pun, FILED. [Entered: 05/22/2022 09:58:00 PM] |
| Filing 9 FORM C-A, on behalf of Petitioner Bhimraj Pun, FILED. [Entered: 05/22/2022 09:52:00 PM] |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner Bhimraj Pun, FILED. [Entered: 05/22/2022 09:47:00 PM] |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Kevin Conway in place of attorney Lisa Arnold, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 05/12/2022 11:42:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Kevin Conway for Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 05/06/2022 12:41:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 05/06/2022 10:11:00 AM] |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Petitioner Bhimraj Pun, USCA receipt # A02-1029-ACMS, FILED. [Entered: 05/06/2022 10:06:00 AM] |
| Filing 3 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Bhimraj Pun, OPENED. [Entered: 05/06/2022 10:04:00 AM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 4/8/2022, RECEIVED. [Entered: 05/04/2022 10:36:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Bhimraj Pun, FILED. [Entered: 05/04/2022 10:35:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Pun v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: BHIMRAJ PUN | |
| Represented By: | Ramesh Kumar Shrestha |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Represented By: | Kevin Conway |
| Represented By: | Lisa Marie Arnold |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
