Morrow v. United States of America
| NEB MORROW |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 22-6328 |
| July 13, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 10/26/2022, determining the appeal to SDNY, ISSUED.[Mandate] [Entered: 10/26/2022 10:54 AM] |
| Filing 14 CERTIFIED ORDER, dated 10/26/2022, to SDNY, ISSUED. [Entered: 10/26/2022 10:50 AM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION ORDER, granting and transferring to the district court Second or Successive Application, at docket entry 1, on behalf of Petitioner Neb Morrow, by JMW, DJ, JFB, copy to pro se Petitioner, FILED. [Entered: 10/26/2022 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 12 NEW CASE MANAGER, Yana Segal, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 10/26/2022 10:33 AM] |
| Filing 11 LETTER, on behalf of Respondent United States of America, agreeing that the Petitioner's application should be granted, RECEIVED. [Entered: 10/17/2022 06:03 PM] |
Filing 10
ORDER, dated 10/05/2022, requesting the Respondent, United States of America to file a response to the Motion, to File Successive Application [5] by 10/17/2022, copy to pro se petitioner, FILED. [Entered: 10/05/2022 10:31:00 AM]
|
| Filing 9 MOTION ORDER, that decision on the motion for leave to file successive is STAYED until further order of this Court to allow adequate time for review of the motion and issuance of a decision, at docket entry 1, on behalf of Petitioner Neb Morrow, by DC, copy to pro se petitioner, FILED. [Entered: 09/15/2022 12:02:00 PM] |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Neb Morrow, FILED. [Entered: 08/16/2022 03:15:00 PM] |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Respondent United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 08/01/2022 11:15:33 AM] |
| Filing 6 CURED DEFECTIVE Second or Successive Application FILED, at entry 1, on behalf of filer Petitioner Neb Morrow, FILED. [Entered: 08/01/2022 08:50:22 AM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION, to file 2255 successive application, on behalf of Petitioner Neb Morrow, FILED. [Entered: 07/27/2022 02:57:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 07/13/2022 10:46:00 AM] |
| Filing 3 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Second or Successive Application FILED, at docket entry 1, on behalf of Petitioner Neb Morrow, FILED. [Entered: 07/13/2022 10:44:00 AM] |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION, for Second or Successive habeas petition, on behalf of Petitioner Neb Morrow, OPENED. [Entered: 07/13/2022 10:36:00 AM] |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING, MOTION for an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive application, on behalf of Petitioner Neb Morrow, FILED. [Entered: 07/13/2022 10:16:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Morrow v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: NEB MORROW | |
| Represented By: | Neb Morrow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Won S. Shin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
