Pun v. Garland
BHARAT KUMAR PUN |
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
22-6428 |
September 8, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 NEW CASE MANAGER, Khadijah Young, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 04/07/2023 02:10 PM] |
Filing 31 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 04/07/2023, determining the appeal to OIL, ISSUED.[Mandate] [Entered: 04/07/2023 02:08 PM] |
Filing 30 FRAP 42(b) IMMIGRATION REMAND ORDER, remanding case to BIA, FILED. [Entered: 04/07/2023 02:06 PM] |
Filing 29 MOTION, for FRAP 42(b) immigration remand, on behalf of Petitioner Bharat Kumar Pun, FILED. Service date 4/4/2023 by ACMS. [Entered: 04/04/2023 11:38 AM] |
Filing 28 MOTION ORDER, granting motion for extension of time, until 04/06/2023 to file opening brief, at docket entry 26, on behalf of Petitioner Bharat Kumar Pun, by JAC, FILED. [Entered: 03/30/2023 10:59 AM] |
Filing 27 CURED DEFECTIVE motion for extension of time, at entry 26, on behalf of filer Petitioner Bharat Kumar Pun, FILED. [Entered: 03/28/2023 12:47 PM] |
Filing 26 MOTION, for extension of time, on behalf of Petitioner Bharat Kumar Pun, FILED. Service date 3/27/2023 12:00:00 AM by ACMS. [Entered: 03/27/2023 07:26 PM] |
Filing 25 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, motion for extension of time, at docket entry 24, on behalf of Petitioner Bharat Kumar Pun, FILED. [Entered: 03/27/2023 02:32 PM] |
Filing 24 MOTION, for extension of time, on behalf of Petitioner Bharat Kumar Pun, FILED. Service date 3/26/2023 12:00:00 AM by ACMS. [Entered: 03/26/2023 01:32 PM] |
Filing 23 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Petitioner Bharat Kumar Pun's Brief due date as 03/27/2023, FILED. [Entered: 01/12/2023 01:23 PM] |
Filing 22 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Petitioner Bharat Kumar Pun, informing Court of proposed due date 03/27/2023, RECEIVED. Service date 1/3/2023 12:00:00 AM by ACMS. [Entered: 01/03/2023 11:46 AM] |
Filing 21 TOLLING CANCELLATION ORDER, FILED. [Entered: 12/29/2022 05:08 PM] |
Filing 20 IMMIGRATION 90-DAY TOLLING ORDER, FILED. [Entered: 09/29/2022 11:46:00 AM] |
Filing 19 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILED [Entered: 09/28/2022 11:27:00 AM] |
Filing 18 NEW CASE MANAGER, Connie Mazariego, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 09/27/2022 12:44:00 PM] |
Filing 17 ATTORNEY, Lisa Marie Arnold for Merrick Garland, TERMINATED. [Entered: 09/26/2022 11:41:00 AM] |
Filing 16 CURED DEFECTIVE Notice of Appearance for Attorney prior to case assignment, at entry 6, on behalf of filer Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 09/26/2022 11:38:00 AM] |
Filing 15 ATTORNEY, Elizabeth Robyn Chapman in place of attorney Lisa Arnold, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 09/26/2022 11:36:00 AM] |
Filing 14 CURED DEFECTIVE Acknowledgment Notice of Appearance Form, at entry 11, on behalf of filer Petitioner Bharat Kumar Pun, FILED. [Entered: 09/26/2022 11:29:00 AM] |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Elizabeth Robyn Chapman for Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 09/21/2022 06:51:00 PM] |
Filing 12 FORM C-A, on behalf of Petitioner Bharat Kumar Pun, FILED. [Entered: 09/18/2022 10:16:00 PM] |
Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner Bharat Kumar Pun, FILED. [Entered: 09/18/2022 10:14:00 PM] |
Filing 10 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment Notice of Appearance Form, at docket entry 7, on behalf of Petitioner Bharat Kumar Pun, FILED. [Entered: 09/09/2022 11:29:00 AM] |
Filing 9 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance for Attorney prior to case assignment, at docket entry 6, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 09/09/2022 11:13:00 AM] |
Filing 8 FORM C-A, on behalf of Petitioner Bharat Kumar Pun, FILED. [Entered: 09/08/2022 06:24:00 PM] |
Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner Bharat Kumar Pun, FILED. [Entered: 09/08/2022 06:22:00 PM] |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Elizabeth Robyn Chapman for Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 09/08/2022 03:46:00 PM] |
Filing 5 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 09/08/2022 10:07:00 AM] |
Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Petitioner Bharat Kumar Pun, USCA receipt # A02-1201-ACMS, FILED. [Entered: 09/08/2022 10:03:00 AM] |
Filing 3 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Bharat Kumar Pun, OPENED. [Entered: 09/08/2022 10:01:00 AM] |
Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 8/15/2022, RECEIVED. [Entered: 09/07/2022 06:24:00 PM] |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Bharat Kumar Pun, FILED. [Entered: 09/07/2022 06:23:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Pun v. Garland | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: BHARAT KUMAR PUN | |
Represented By: | Stuart Mitchell Lewis Altman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
Represented By: | OIL |
Represented By: | Elizabeth Robyn Chapman |
Represented By: | Lisa Marie Arnold |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.