Ersken v. Commissioner of Social Securit
| Gerry Jacob Ersken |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 22-648 |
| March 24, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| SOC SEC-DIWW (42 USC 405(g)) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, [22], on behalf of Appellant Gerry Jacob Ersken, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3311156] [22-648] [Entered: 05/09/2022 11:02 AM] |
| Filing 22 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Gerry Jacob Ersken, FILED. Service date 05/05/2022 by US mail.[3311136] [22-648] [Entered: 05/09/2022 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 21 CURED DEFECTIVE Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel, [ # 19 ], on behalf of Appellee Commissioner of Social Security, FILED.[3297999] [22-648] [Entered: 04/15/2022 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 20 ATTORNEY, Heather M. LaCount for Commissioner of Social Security, in case 22-648 , [ # 19 ], ADDED.[3297996] [22-648] [Entered: 04/15/2022 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Commissioner of Social Security, FILED. Service date 04/15/2022 by CM/ECF, US mail. [3297536] [22-648] [Entered: 04/15/2022 09:59 AM] |
| Filing 18 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel, [15], on behalf of Appellee Commissioner of Social Security, FILED.[3297429] [22-648] [Entered: 04/15/2022 08:53 AM] |
Filing 17
ORDER, dated 04/14/2022, dismissing appeal by 05/05/2022, unless Appellant Gerry Jacob Ersken, submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, copy to pro se Appellant, FILED.[3297271] [22-648] [Entered: 04/14/2022 04:18 PM]
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER, dated 04/14/2022, dismissing appeal by 05/05/2022, unless Appellant Gerry Jacob Ersken, submits form D-P, copy to pro se Appellant, FILED.[3297257] [22-648] [Entered: 04/14/2022 04:10 PM]
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Commissioner of Social Security, FILED. Service date 04/14/2022 by CM/ECF. [3296487] [22-648] [Entered: 04/14/2022 07:48 AM] |
| Filing 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Commissioner of Social Security, FILED. Service date 03/30/2022 by CM/ECF.[3288331] [22-648] [Entered: 03/30/2022 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY, Molly E. Carter for Commissioner of Social Security, in case 22-648 , [ # 12 ], ADDED.[3288315] [22-648] [Entered: 03/30/2022 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Commissioner of Social Security, FILED. Service date 03/30/2022 by CM/ECF. [3287709] [22-648] [Entered: 03/30/2022 09:44 AM] |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY, Karen Folster Lesperance, [ # 6 ], in place of attorney Rajit Singh Dosanjh, SUBSTITUTED.[3287608] [22-648] [Entered: 03/30/2022 08:41 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Commissioner of Social Security, FILED. Service date 03/28/2022 by US mail. [3286313] [22-648] [Entered: 03/28/2022 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3286279] [22-648] [Entered: 03/28/2022 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3286271] [22-648] [Entered: 03/28/2022 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 01/26/2022, RECEIVED.[3286263] [22-648] [Entered: 03/28/2022 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 01/26/2022, RECEIVED.[3286261] [22-648] [Entered: 03/28/2022 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Gerry Jacob Ersken, FILED. [3286250] [22-648] [Entered: 03/28/2022 03:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
