Akinde v. New York City Health and Hosp
| Oludotun Akinde |
| New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, c/o Harlem Hospital Center and Shari Singleton, Labor Relations |
| 22-715 |
| April 4, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| CIVIL RIGHTS-Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 MOTION, for assignment of pro bono counsel, on behalf of Appellant Oludotun Akinde, FILED. Service date 05/01/2022 by email.[3307225] [22-715] [Entered: 05/02/2022 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 23 CURED DEFECTIVE MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS [ # 16 ], on behalf of Appellant Oludotun Akinde, FILED.[3304286] [22-715] [Entered: 04/27/2022 09:35 AM] |
| Filing 20 ATTORNEY, Jonathan A. Popolow, [ # 19 ], in place of attorney Sylvia Hinds-Radix, SUBSTITUTED.[3298459] [22-715] [Entered: 04/18/2022 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation and Ms. Shari Singleton, FILED. Service date 04/15/2022 by CM/ECF, US mail. [3298145] [22-715] [Entered: 04/15/2022 04:27 PM] |
| Filing 17 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Appellant Oludotun Akinde, FILED. Service date 04/12/2022 by email.[3297764] [22-715] [Entered: 04/15/2022 12:25 PM] |
| Filing 16 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Oludotun Akinde, FILED. Service date 04/12/2022 by email.[3297760] [22-715] [Entered: 04/15/2022 12:20 PM] |
| Filing 15 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Oludotun Akinde, FILED. Service date 04/04/2022 by email.[3297741] [22-715] [Entered: 04/15/2022 12:02 PM] |
| Filing 14 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, motion to proceed in forma pauperis, [10], on behalf of Appellant Oludotun Akinde, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[3297148] [22-715] [Entered: 04/14/2022 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 13 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D-P, [9], on behalf of Appellant Oludotun Akinde, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[3297141] [22-715] [Entered: 04/14/2022 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 12 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, [8], on behalf of Appellant Oludotun Akinde, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[3297085] [22-715] [Entered: 04/14/2022 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 11 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Oludotun Akinde, informing Court of proposed due date 07/11/2022, RECEIVED. Service date 04/12/2022 by email.[3297079] [22-715] [Entered: 04/14/2022 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Oludotun Akinde, FILED. Service date 04/12/2022 by email.[3297073] [22-715] [Entered: 04/14/2022 02:48 PM] |
| Filing 9 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Oludotun Akinde, FILED. Service date 04/04/2022 by email.[3297056] [22-715] [Entered: 04/14/2022 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Appellant Oludotun Akinde, FILED. Service date 04/12/2022 by email.[3297046] [22-715] [Entered: 04/14/2022 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3292404] [22-715] [Entered: 04/06/2022 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3292398] [22-715] [Entered: 04/06/2022 01:59 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 03/30/2022, RECEIVED.[3292396] [22-715] [Entered: 04/06/2022 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, dated 03/29/2022, RECEIVED.[3292393] [22-715] [Entered: 04/06/2022 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Oludotun Akinde, FILED. [3292389] [22-715] [Entered: 04/06/2022 01:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
