United States of America v. Melendez-Perez (Fabian Reyes-R
| Francisco Melendez-Perez, AKA Paco, AKA El Mojarra, Abel Romero-Melendez, AKA Borrega, AKA La Borrega, Jose Osvaldo Melendez-Rojas, Jose Miguel Melendez-Rojas, AKA Gueramex, AKA Jose Melendez Perez and Rosalio Melendez-Rojas, AKA Leonel, AKA Wacho, AKA El Guacho |
| United States of America |
| Fabian Reyes-Rojas |
| 22-729 |
| April 6, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 TRANSCRIPT STATUS UPDATE LETTER, dated 04/08/2022, on behalf of Appellant Abel Romero-Melendez in 22-399, 22-333, informing court of transcript delays, RECEIVED. Service date 04/08/2022 by CM/ECF.[3294187] [22-399, 22-333, 22-358, 22-386, 22-397, 22-729] [Entered: 04/08/2022 07:41 PM] |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY, Tanya Hajjar, [ # 4 ], in place of attorney David C. James, SUBSTITUTED.[3293907] [22-729] [Entered: 04/08/2022 02:28 PM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee USA United States of America, FILED. Service date 04/08/2022 by CM/ECF. [3293899] [22-729] [Entered: 04/08/2022 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3293284] [22-729] [Entered: 04/07/2022 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 03/30/2022, RECEIVED.[3293283] [22-729] [Entered: 04/07/2022 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Fabian Reyes-Rojas in 22-729, FILED. [3293274] [22-729, 22-333] [Entered: 04/07/2022 02:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
