Vazquez-Diaz v. United States of America
Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz |
United States of America |
22-790 |
April 14, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
PRISONER PET-Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER, dated 06/01/2022, dismissing appeal by 06/22/2022, unless Appellant Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz, submits Form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3324650] [22-790] [Entered: 06/01/2022 01:58 PM] |
Filing 27 ORDER, dated 06/01/2022, dismissing appeal by 06/22/2022, unless Appellant Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz, submits an Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3324642] [22-790] [Entered: 06/01/2022 01:52 PM] |
Filing 26 STRIKE ORDER, striking Appellant Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz, Acknowledgment and Notice of Apperance Form, LR 31.2 Scheduling Notification, Motion, for oral argument, to proceed in forma pauperis and Form D-P, [11], [12], [13], [13], [17], from the docket, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3324638] [22-790] [Entered: 06/01/2022 01:44 PM] |
Filing 23 ORDER, dated 05/11/2022, dismissing appeal by 06/01/2022, unless Appellant Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz, submits fee or moves to proceed in forma pauperis, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3312726] [22-790] [Entered: 05/11/2022 09:21 AM] |
Filing 22 STRIKE ORDER, striking Appellant Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz, Motion, to proceed in forma pauperis, [4], from the docket, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3312724] [22-790] [Entered: 05/11/2022 09:18 AM] |
Filing 19 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3312080] [22-790] [Entered: 05/10/2022 11:23 AM] |
Filing 18 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D-P, [17], on behalf of Appellant Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3307267] [22-790] [Entered: 05/02/2022 02:35 PM] |
Filing 17 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz, FILED. Service date 04/20/2022 by US mail.[3307236] [22-790] [Entered: 05/02/2022 02:17 PM] |
Filing 16 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, for oral argument, to proceed in forma pauperis, [13], [13], on behalf of Appellant Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3307217] [22-790] [Entered: 05/02/2022 02:09 PM] |
Filing 15 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, LR 31.2 Scheduling Notification, [12], on behalf of Appellant Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3307208] [22-790] [Entered: 05/02/2022 02:05 PM] |
Filing 14 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, [11], on behalf of Appellant Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3307197] [22-790] [Entered: 05/02/2022 02:00 PM] |
Filing 13 MOTION, for oral argument, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz, FILED. Service date 04/20/2022 by US mail.[3307186] [22-790] [Entered: 05/02/2022 01:57 PM] |
Filing 12 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz, informing Court of proposed due date 04/20/2022, RECEIVED. Service date 04/20/2022 by US mail.[3307177] [22-790] [Entered: 05/02/2022 01:52 PM] |
Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz, FILED. Service date 04/20/2022 by US mail.[3307172] [22-790] [Entered: 05/02/2022 01:51 PM] |
Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee United States of America, FILED. Service date 04/28/2022 by CM/ECF, US mail.[3305163] [22-790] [Entered: 04/28/2022 10:32 AM] |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Allison Rovner for United States of America, in case 22-790, [ # 8 ], ADDED.[3305087] [22-790] [Entered: 04/28/2022 09:35 AM] |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee United States of America, FILED. Service date 04/27/2022 by US mail. [3304938] [22-790] [Entered: 04/27/2022 06:17 PM] |
Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3297035] [22-790] [Entered: 04/14/2022 02:30 PM] |
Filing 5 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, to proceed in forma pauperis, [4], on behalf of Appellant Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3297033] [22-790] [Entered: 04/14/2022 02:27 PM] |
Filing 4 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz, FILED. Service date 04/04/2022 by US mail.[3297031] [22-790] [Entered: 04/14/2022 02:26 PM] |
Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 03/21/2022, RECEIVED.[3297030] [22-790] [Entered: 04/14/2022 02:25 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 03/21/2022, RECEIVED.[3297029] [22-790] [Entered: 04/14/2022 02:25 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz, FILED. [3297023] [22-790] [Entered: 04/14/2022 02:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Vazquez-Diaz v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz | |
Represented By: | Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Benjamin H. Torrance |
Represented By: | Allison Rovner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.