Fox v. Kijakazi
| Lee Fox |
| Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration |
| 22-793 |
| April 11, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| SOC SEC-DIWW (42 USC 405(g)) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 ATTORNEY, Karen Folster Lesperance for Kilolo Kijakazi, in case 22-793, [ # 22 ], ADDED.[3309218] [22-793] [Entered: 05/04/2022 03:48 PM] |
| Filing 22 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Kilolo Kijakazi, FILED. Service date 05/04/2022 by CM/ECF. [3308605] [22-793] [Entered: 05/04/2022 09:13 AM] |
| Filing 21 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Lee Fox Brief due date as 07/18/2022 FILED.[3305269] [22-793] [Entered: 04/28/2022 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 18 NEW CASE MANAGER, Connie Mazariego, ASSIGNED.[3303367] [22-793] [Entered: 04/26/2022 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 15 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Kilolo Kijakazi, FILED. Service date 04/20/2022 by CM/ECF.[3300145] [22-793] [Entered: 04/20/2022 09:04 AM] |
| Filing 12 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Lee Fox, informing Court of proposed due date 07/18/2022, RECEIVED. Service date 04/19/2022 by CM/ECF.[3299772] [22-793] [Entered: 04/19/2022 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 11 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Lee Fox, FILED. Service date 04/19/2022 by CM/ECF.[3299765] [22-793] [Entered: 04/19/2022 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 10 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Lee Fox, FILED. Service date 04/19/2022 by CM/ECF.[3299762] [22-793] [Entered: 04/19/2022 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Lee Fox, FILED. Service date 04/19/2022 by CM/ECF.[3299756] [22-793] [Entered: 04/19/2022 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Natasha Oeltjen, [ # 7 ], in place of attorney Heather LaCount, SUBSTITUTED.[3297611] [22-793] [Entered: 04/15/2022 10:41 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Kilolo Kijakazi, FILED. Service date 04/15/2022 by CM/ECF. [3297439] [22-793] [Entered: 04/15/2022 09:01 AM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3297259] [22-793] [Entered: 04/14/2022 04:10 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 03/24/2022, RECEIVED.[3297252] [22-793] [Entered: 04/14/2022 04:08 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 03/24/2022, RECEIVED.[3297250] [22-793] [Entered: 04/14/2022 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Lee Fox, FILED. [3297232] [22-793] [Entered: 04/14/2022 03:59 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Fox v. Kijakazi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Lee Fox | |
| Represented By: | Peter A. Gorton Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Natasha Oeltjen Esq. |
| Represented By: | Karen Folster Lesperance Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
