Soni v. Commissioner of Internal Reven
| Om P. Soni and Anjali Soni |
| Commissioner of Internal Revenue |
| 22-829 |
| April 15, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Soni v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
|
|
Soni v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Commissioner of Internal Revenue, FILED. Service date 04/21/2022 by US mail. [3300883] [22-829] [Entered: 04/21/2022 07:52 AM] |
| Filing 7 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Attorney Mr. Gilbert Steven Rothenberg for Appellee Commissioner of Internal Revenue, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED.[3299465] [22-829] [Entered: 04/19/2022 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3298869] [22-829] [Entered: 04/18/2022 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 4 TAX COURT DECISION, dated 01/07/2022, RECEIVED.[3298825] [22-829] [Entered: 04/18/2022 03:19 PM] |
| Filing 3 TAX COURT MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION, dated 12/01/2021, RECEIVED.[3298823] [22-829] [Entered: 04/18/2022 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 2 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Anjali Soni and Om P. Soni, in Tax Court, FILED.[3298821] [22-829] [Entered: 04/18/2022 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF TAX COURT APPEAL, with copy of tax court docket, on behalf of Appellant Anjali Soni and Om P. Soni, FILED. [3298780] [22-829] [Entered: 04/18/2022 02:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
