In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
Petitioner: Multi-State Governmental Entities Group
Respondent: State of California, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware, District of Columbia, State of Maryland, State of Rhode Island, State of Vermont, The State of Washington, U.S. Trustee William K. Harrington, Ronald Bass, Ellen Isaacs, Maria Ecke, Andrew Ecke, The City of Grande Prairie, as Representative Plaintiff for a Class Consisting of All Canadian Municipalities, the Cities of Brantford, Grand Prairie, Lethbridge, and Wetaskiwin and The Peter Ballantyne Cree Nation, on behalf of All Canadian First Nations and Metis People, the Peter Ballantyne Cree Nation on behalf itself, and the Lac La Ronge Indian Band
Case Number: 22-88
Filed: January 18, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2022 Filing 36 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Respondent State of Connecticut in 22-85, 22-88, 22-90, 22-94, 22-96, 22-97, FILED. Service date 01/19/2022 by CM/ECF. [3246392] [22-85, 22-88, 22-90, 22-94, 22-96, 22-97] [Entered: 01/19/2022 05:32 PM]
January 19, 2022 Filing 35 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Respondent State of Connecticut in 22-85, 22-88, 22-90, 22-94, 22-96, 22-97, FILED. Service date 01/19/2022 by CM/ECF. [3246391] [22-85, 22-88, 22-90, 22-94, 22-96, 22-97] [Entered: 01/19/2022 05:28 PM]
January 19, 2022 Filing 34 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Respondent District of Columbia, FILED. Service date 01/19/2022 by CM/ECF, US mail. [3246257] [22-88] [Entered: 01/19/2022 03:56 PM]
January 19, 2022 Filing 33 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel, [28], on behalf of Respondent District of Columbia, FILED.[3246180] [22-88] [Entered: 01/19/2022 03:20 PM]
January 19, 2022 Filing 31 ATTORNEY, Michael Raab for William K. Harrington, in case 22-88, [ # 26 ], ADDED.[3246135] [22-88] [Entered: 01/19/2022 03:01 PM]
January 19, 2022 Filing 30 ATTORNEY, Michael Shih for William K. Harrington, in case 22-88, [ # 25 ], ADDED.[3246132] [22-88] [Entered: 01/19/2022 02:57 PM]
January 19, 2022 Filing 29 CURED DEFECTIVE NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL [ # 24 ], [ # 25 ], on behalf of Respondent William K. Harrington, FILED.[3246122] [22-88] [Entered: 01/19/2022 02:54 PM]
January 19, 2022 Filing 28 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Respondent District of Columbia, FILED. Service date 01/19/2022 by CM/ECF, US mail. [3246046] [22-88] [Entered: 01/19/2022 02:11 PM]
January 19, 2022 Filing 26 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Respondent William K. Harrington, FILED. Service date 01/19/2022 by CM/ECF, US mail. [3245981] [22-88] [Entered: 01/19/2022 01:41 PM]
January 19, 2022 Filing 25 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Respondent William K. Harrington, FILED. Service date 01/19/2022 by CM/ECF, US mail. [3245814] [22-88] [Entered: 01/19/2022 12:54 PM]
January 19, 2022 Filing 24 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel, [20], on behalf of Respondent William K. Harrington, FILED.[3245720] [22-88] [Entered: 01/19/2022 12:30 PM]
January 19, 2022 Filing 23 ATTORNEY, Michael Shih for William K. Harrington, in case 22-88 , [20], ADDED.[3245632] [22-88] [Entered: 01/19/2022 11:50 AM]
January 19, 2022 Filing 20 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Respondent William K. Harrington, FILED. Service date 01/19/2022 by CM/ECF. [3245495] [22-88] [Entered: 01/19/2022 10:51 AM]
January 19, 2022 Filing 18 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3245434] [22-85, 22-88, 22-90, 22-94, 22-96, 22-97] [Entered: 01/19/2022 10:25 AM]
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER, dated 01/19/2022, The above-captioned petitions for leave to appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) will be considered on an expedited basis. Any response to the petitions for leave to appeal must be filed by 5:00 PM on Thursday, January 20, 2022, copy to pro se respondents, FILED.[3245428] [22-85, 22-88, 22-90, 22-94, 22-96, 22-97] [Entered: 01/19/2022 10:20 AM]
January 18, 2022 Filing 10 MOTION, to expedite appeal, on behalf of Petitioner Multi-State Governmental Entities Group in 22-85, 22-88, FILED. Service date 01/18/2022 by CM/ECF, US mail. [3245223] [22-85, 22-88, 22-90, 22-94, 22-96, 22-97] [Entered: 01/18/2022 11:44 PM]
January 18, 2022 Filing 8 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Jeff Payne, Esq. for State of Maryland, Sonya L. Lebsack, Esq. for Respondent District of Columbia, Tad Robinson O'Neill, Esq. for Respondent The State of Washington and Kathryn Sabatini, Esq. for Respondent State of Vermont and State of Rhode Island in 22-88, Paul Kenan Schwartzberg, Esq. for Respondent William K. Harrington and Allen J Underwood, II, Esq. for Respondent The Peter Ballantyne Cree Nation and The City of Grande Prairie in 22-85, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED.[3245144] [22-88, 22-85] [Entered: 01/18/2022 05:30 PM]
January 18, 2022 Filing 3 NOTE: See lead case, 22-85, containing complete set of docket entries.[3245062] [22-88, 22-85] [Entered: 01/18/2022 04:37 PM]
January 18, 2022 Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 12/16/2021, RECEIVED.[3245056] [22-88] [Entered: 01/18/2022 04:34 PM]
January 18, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION, for leave to appeal (28 U.S.C. 1292(b)), on behalf of Petitioner Multi-State Governmental Entities Group in 22-88, FILED. Service date 01/16/2022 by US mail.[3245054] [22-88, 22-85] [Entered: 01/18/2022 04:33 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In Re: Purdue Pharma L.P.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Multi-State Governmental Entities Group
Represented By: Jeffrey Allen Liesemer Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of California
Represented By: Bernard Ardavan Eskandari Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Connecticut
Represented By: Matthew J. Gold Esq.
Represented By: Irve J. Goldman Esq.
Represented By: Clare E. Kindall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Delaware
Represented By: Jillian Lazar Esq.
Represented By: Matthew J. Gold Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: District of Columbia
Represented By: Sonya L. Lebsack Esq.
Represented By: Matthew J. Gold Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Maryland
Represented By: Brian Edmunds Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Rhode Island
Represented By: Matthew J. Gold Esq.
Represented By: Kathryn Sabatini Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Vermont
Represented By: Kathryn Sabatini Esq.
Represented By: Matthew J. Gold Esq.
Represented By: Jill S. Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: The State of Washington
Represented By: Tad Robinson O'Neill Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: U.S. Trustee William K. Harrington
Represented By: Andrew D. Velez-Rivera
Represented By: Michael Raab
Represented By: Michael Shih Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ronald Bass
Represented By: Ronald Bass
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ellen Isaacs
Represented By: Ellen Isaacs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Maria Ecke
Represented By: Maria Ecke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Andrew Ecke
Represented By: Andrew Ecke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: The City of Grande Prairie, as Representative Plaintiff for a Class Consisting of All Canadian Municipalities, the Cities of Brantford, Grand Prairie, Lethbridge, and Wetaskiwin
Represented By: Allen J. Underwood Esq. II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: The Peter Ballantyne Cree Nation, on behalf of All Canadian First Nations and Metis People, the Peter Ballantyne Cree Nation on behalf itself, and the Lac La Ronge Indian Band
Represented By: Allen J. Underwood Esq. II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?