Mai v. The New York State Office of T
| Hong Mai |
| CVS Pharmacy at 338 East 23rd Street, NYC 10010, The New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, The New York State Department of Health, The New York City Health and Hospital Corp., MetroPlus Health Plan, CVS Pharmacy at 530 Burnside Avenue, Inwood, NY 11096, CVS Pharmacy at 72-09 Northern Boulevard, Jackson Height, NY 11372, UnitedHealthcare Plan, Germer Pharmarcy & Surgical, The Bellevue Hospital Pharmacy and Rite Aid Pharmacy |
| 22-915 |
| April 25, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE, to Respondent CVS Pharmacy at 338 East 23rd Street, NYC 10010, CVS Pharmacy at 530 Burnside Avenue, Inwood, NY 11096, CVS Pharmacy at 72-09 Northern Boulevard, Jackson Height, NY 11372, Germer Pharmarcy & Surgical, MetroPlus Health Plan, Rite Aid Pharmacy, The Bellevue Hospital Pharmacy and UnitedHealthcare Plan, regarding a corporation proceeding Pro Se, and requesting a response 30 days from the date of this letter, SENT.[3305718] [22-915] [Entered: 04/28/2022 03:56 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER, dated 04/28/2022, dismissing appeal by 05/17/2022, unless Petitioner Hong Mai, moves for leave to file, copy to pro se petitioner, FILED.[3305597] [22-915] [Entered: 04/28/2022 02:35 PM]
|
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, dated 03/31/2022, RECEIVED.[3305561] [22-915] [Entered: 04/28/2022 02:12 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, and district court docket, on behalf of Petitioner Hong Mai, RECEIVED.[3305558] [22-915] [Entered: 04/28/2022 02:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
