Makhnevich v. Bougopoulos
| The Board of Managers of the 2900 Ocean Condominium and Bryant Tovar |
| Stacy Makhnevich |
| Gregory S. Bougopoulos and Novick, Edelstein, Lubell, Reisman, Wasserman & Leventhal, P.C. |
| 22-936 |
| April 27, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| STATUTES-Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 46 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Stacy Makhnevich Brief due date as 08/10/2022 FILED.[3332894] [22-936] [Entered: 06/15/2022 10:15 AM] |
| Filing 43 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Stacy Makhnevich, informing Court of proposed due date 08/10/2022, RECEIVED. Service date 06/12/2022 by CM/ECF.[3331054] [22-936] [Entered: 06/12/2022 07:07 PM] |
| Filing 40 REPLY TO OPPOSITION [ # 35 ], on behalf of Appellant Stacy Makhnevich, FILED. Service date 06/01/2022 by CM/ECF.[3325122][40] [22-936] [Entered: 06/01/2022 05:23 PM] |
| Filing 35 OPPOSITION TO , to disqualify attorney [ # 30 ], to reconsider [ # 30 ], on behalf of Appellee Gregory S. Bougopoulos and Novick, Edelstein, Lubell, Reisman, Wasserman & Leventhal, P.C., FILED. Service date 05/26/2022 by CM/ECF. [3321727] [22-936] [Entered: 05/26/2022 09:33 AM] |
| Filing 34 NEW CASE MANAGER, Brenda Mojica, copy to pro se, ASSIGNED.[3320725] [22-936] [Entered: 05/24/2022 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 30 MOTION, to disqualify attorney, to reconsider, on behalf of Appellant Stacy Makhnevich, FILED. Service date 05/23/2022 by CM/ECF. [3320022] [22-936] [Entered: 05/23/2022 09:13 PM] |
| Filing 29 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Gregory S. Bougopoulos and Novick, Edelstein, Lubell, Reisman, Wasserman & Leventhal, P.C., FILED. Service date 05/20/2022 by CM/ECF.[3318731] [22-936] [Entered: 05/20/2022 09:36 AM] |
| Filing 26 MOTION ORDER, granting motion for admission pro hac vice, Mr. Bougopoulos is directed to register as a Filing User under Local Rule 25.1 to file documents electronically in this case within three (3) days of the date of this order [ # 12 ] filed by Appellee Gregory S. Bougopoulos, Novick, Edelstein, Lubell, Reisman, Wasserman & Leventhal, P.C. by WJN, FILED. [3318203][26] [22-936] [Entered: 05/19/2022 11:28 AM] |
| Filing 24 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, for Affidavit of Service, on behalf of Appellee The Board of Managers of the 2900 Ocean Condominium, FILED. Service date 05/18/2022 by CM/ECF, email, US mail.[3317761] [22-936] [Entered: 05/18/2022 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 22 CURED DEFECTIVE Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form [ # 20 ], [ # 21 ], on behalf of Appellant Stacy Makhnevich, FILED.[3317177] [22-936] [Entered: 05/18/2022 10:15 AM] |
| Filing 21 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Stacy Makhnevich, FILED. Service date 05/18/2022 by CM/ECF.[3317163] [22-936] [Entered: 05/18/2022 10:10 AM] |
| Filing 20 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, [19], on behalf of Appellant Stacy Makhnevich, FILED.[3317008] [22-936] [Entered: 05/18/2022 08:23 AM] |
| Filing 19 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Stacy Makhnevich, FILED. Service date 05/17/2022 by CM/ECF.[3316985] [22-936] [Entered: 05/17/2022 11:46 PM] |
| Filing 17 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee The Board of Managers of the 2900 Ocean Condominium, FILED. Service date 05/17/2022 by CM/ECF.[3316641] [22-936] [Entered: 05/17/2022 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 18 PAPERS, CM/ECF Pro Se Filing User Request Form, RECEIVED. No Service.[3316680] [22-936] [Entered: 05/17/2022 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 16 NOTICE, to Appellee Gregory S. Bougopoulos and Novick, Edelstein, Lubell, Reisman, Wasserman & Leventhal, P.C. , for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[3315275] [22-936] [Entered: 05/16/2022 09:04 AM] |
Filing 15
ORDER, dated 05/16/2022, dismissing appeal by 06/06/2022, unless Appellant Stacy Makhnevich, submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3315265] [22-936] [Entered: 05/16/2022 09:00 AM]
|
| Filing 12 MOTION, for admission pro hac vice, on behalf of Appellee Gregory S. Bougopoulos, Novick, Edelstein, Lubell, Reisman, Wasserman & Leventhal, P.C. and The Board of Managers of the 2900 Ocean Condominium, FILED. Service date 05/11/2022 by US mail, email.[3313776] [22-936] [Entered: 05/12/2022 11:05 AM] |
| Filing 11 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Stacy Makhnevich, FILED. Service date 05/10/2022 by US mail.[3312735] [22-936] [Entered: 05/11/2022 09:26 AM] |
| Filing 7 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3305541] [22-936] [Entered: 04/28/2022 02:00 PM] |
| Filing 6 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Attorney Gregory Stephen Bougopoulos, Esq. for Appellee Gregory S. Bougopoulos and Novick, Edelstein, Lubell, Reisman, Wasserman & Leventhal, P.C., orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED.[3305539] [22-936] [Entered: 04/28/2022 01:59 PM] |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3305534] [22-936] [Entered: 04/28/2022 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Stacy Makhnevich, district court receipt # 4653164799 , FILED.[3305529] [22-936] [Entered: 04/28/2022 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 03/30/2022, RECEIVED.[3305518] [22-936] [Entered: 04/28/2022 01:49 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, dated 03/29/2022, RECEIVED.[3305516] [22-936] [Entered: 04/28/2022 01:48 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Stacy Makhnevich, FILED. [3305435] [22-936] [Entered: 04/28/2022 01:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
