Conyers v. United States Department of Ve
| Vincent Curtis Conyers |
| United States Department of Veterans Affairs |
| 22-970 |
| May 2, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| CIVIL RIGHTS-Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 05/18/2022, determining the appeal to EDNY, copy to pro se appellant, ISSUED.[Mandate][3317232] [22-970] [Entered: 05/18/2022 10:44 AM] |
| Filing 19 APPEAL, pursuant to Clerk order, dated 05/18/2022, WITHDRAWN.[3317230] [22-970] [Entered: 05/18/2022 10:42 AM] |
Filing 18
ORDER, dated 05/18/2022, granting Appellant request for permission to withdraw this appeal, the appeal is deemed withdrawn, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3317228] [22-970] [Entered: 05/18/2022 10:41 AM]
|
| Filing 17 NEW CASE MANAGER, Margaret Lain, ASSIGNED.[3317224] [22-970] [Entered: 05/18/2022 10:36 AM] |
| Filing 13 LETTER, dated 05/16/2022, on behalf of Appellant Vincent Curtis Conyers, informing the Court that the Appellant would like this appeal to be withdrawn, RECEIVED. Service date 05/16/2022 by email.[3315706] [22-970] [Entered: 05/16/2022 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY, Paulina Angela Stamatelos for United States Department of Veterans Affairs, in case 22-970, [ # 11 ], ADDED.[3308132] [22-970] [Entered: 05/03/2022 12:13 PM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee United States Department of Veterans Affairs, FILED. Service date 05/03/2022 by US mail. [3308057] [22-970] [Entered: 05/03/2022 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee United States Department of Veterans Affairs, FILED. Service date 05/03/2022 by US mail.[3308023] [22-970] [Entered: 05/03/2022 11:29 AM] |
| Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3307613] [22-970] [Entered: 05/02/2022 11:18 PM] |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3307612] [22-970] [Entered: 05/02/2022 11:17 PM] |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Vincent Curtis Conyers, district court receipt # 4653164877, FILED.[3307611] [22-970] [Entered: 05/02/2022 11:16 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 03/30/2022, RECEIVED.[3307610] [22-970] [Entered: 05/02/2022 11:16 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, dated 03/29/2022, RECEIVED.[3307609] [22-970] [Entered: 05/02/2022 11:15 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Vincent Curtis Conyers, FILED. [3307608] [22-970] [Entered: 05/02/2022 11:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Conyers v. United States Department of Ve | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Vincent Curtis Conyers | |
| Represented By: | Vincent Curtis Conyers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: United States Department of Veterans Affairs | |
| Represented By: | Varuni Nelson |
| Represented By: | Paulina Angela Stamatelos Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
