United States of America v. Kosic (Van Manen)
Jasmin Cejovic, AKA Min, Mirsad Bogdanovic, AKA Mike, Shaun Sullivan, Theodore Banasky, AKA Freddy, AKA Eduardo, Anthony Francese, Alexander Bucci, Joseph Cucciniello, AKA Cuch, Kenneth Charlton, Jennifer Bogdanovic, Michael Nunez, AKA Gordo and Medin Kosic, AKA Dino |
United States of America |
Paul Van Manen |
22-980 |
April 29, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Catherine E. Ghosh for Appellee United States of America, in case 22-980 , [ # 5 ], ADDED.[3310023] [22-980] [Entered: 05/05/2022 03:00 PM] |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee USA United States of America in 22-980, FILED. Service date 05/05/2022 by CM/ECF. [3309580] [22-980, 21-845] [Entered: 05/05/2022 10:07 AM] |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee USA United States of America, FILED. Service date 05/05/2022 by US mail. [3309557] [22-980] [Entered: 05/05/2022 09:49 AM] |
Filing 4 NOTE: See lead case, 21-845, containing complete set of docket entries.[3308252] [22-980] [Entered: 05/03/2022 01:42 PM] |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3308244] [22-980] [Entered: 05/03/2022 01:37 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION & ORDER, dated 03/22/2022, RECEIVED.[3308234] [22-980] [Entered: 05/03/2022 01:31 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Paul Van Manen, FILED. [3308211] [22-980]--[Edited 05/03/2022 by TT] [Entered: 05/03/2022 01:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.