Dasler v. Washburn
| Timothy P. Dasler, for himself and on behalf of T. D. |
| Dalene Washburn |
| 23-1156 |
| August 11, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| TORTS INJURY-Med Malpractice |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 LOCAL RULE 31.2 NOTICE, placing this appeal on the Court's Expedited Calendar, setting appellant's brief due date as 11/13/2023, appellee's brief due date as 12/18/2023, copy to pro se appellant,TRANSMITTED.[3578592] [23-1156] [Entered: 10/06/2023 01:13 PM] |
| Filing 20 NEW CASE MANAGER, Ronald Willoughby, ASSIGNED.[3578558] [23-1156] [Entered: 10/06/2023 12:45 PM] |
| Filing 16 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Timothy P. Dasler, FILED. Service date 09/18/2023 by email.[3573076] [23-1156] [Entered: 09/25/2023 03:16 PM] |
| Filing 15 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Dalene Washburn, FILED. Service date 09/12/2023 by CM/ECF.[3567481] [23-1156] [Entered: 09/12/2023 11:33 AM] |
| Filing 14 NOTICE, to Appellee Dalene Washburn , for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[3567288] [23-1156] [Entered: 09/11/2023 11:37 PM] |
Filing 13
ORDER, dated 09/11/2023, dismissing appeal by 10/02/2023, unless Appellant Timothy P. Dasler, submits an Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[3567287] [23-1156] [Entered: 09/11/2023 11:28 PM]
|
| Filing 12 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Timothy P. Dasler, informing Court of proposed due date 11/08/2023, RECEIVED. Service date 09/07/2023 by US mail.[3567286] [23-1156] [Entered: 09/11/2023 11:24 PM] |
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3560586] [23-1156] [Entered: 08/24/2023 10:04 AM] |
| Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3556883] [23-1156] [Entered: 08/16/2023 06:54 AM] |
| Filing 5 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Timothy P. Dasler, FILED. No Service.[3556882] [23-1156] [Entered: 08/16/2023 06:54 AM] |
| Filing 4 DISTRICT COURT TEXT ORDER, dated 08/10/2023, RECEIVED.[3556881] [23-1156] [Entered: 08/16/2023 06:52 AM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 07/18/2023, RECEIVED.[3556880] [23-1156] [Entered: 08/16/2023 06:49 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ENTRY ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND, DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT, AND DISMISSING CASE (Docs. 33, 39), dated 07/18/2023, RECEIVED.[3556879] [23-1156] [Entered: 08/16/2023 06:48 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Timothy P. Dasler, FILED. [3556798] [23-1156] [Entered: 08/15/2023 04:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Dasler v. Washburn | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Timothy P. Dasler, for himself and on behalf of T. D. | |
| Represented By: | Timothy P. Dasler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Dalene Washburn | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer E. McDonald |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
